Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22551215›Full record

ArticleAlcoholism, clinical and experimental research2012

Ethanol preference in Drosophila melanogaster is driven by its caloric value.

Jascha B Pohl, Brett A Baldwin, Boingoc L Dinh, Pinkey Rahman, Dustin Smerek, Francisco J Prado, Nyssa Sherazee, Nigel S Atkinson

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Ethanol Behavioral Responses inCold Spring Harbor protocols · 2023
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Alcohol-induced Aggression.Neuroscience insights · 2021
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Absolute ethanol intake predicts ethanol preference inThe Journal of experimental biology · 2020
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Monitoring food preference inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. A Fly's Eye View of Natural and Drug Reward.Frontiers in physiology · 2018
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Neural plasticity · 2017
    Review
  20. Key Odorants Regulate Food Attraction inFrontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jascha B PohlWaggoner Center for Alcohol and Addiction Research , Section of Neurobiology, The University of Texas at Austin, TX 78712, USA.
Brett A Baldwin
Boingoc L Dinh
Pinkey Rahman
Dustin Smerek
Francisco J Prado
Nyssa Sherazee
Nigel S Atkinson
The University of Texas at Austin · US

Funding

Neurochemical & Behavioral Correlates of ETOH EffectsT32AA007471 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AUSTIN · PI Kimberly Nixon · 1987 to 2026
$9.2M
Epigenetic modification as a mechanism to produce functional toleranceR01AA018037 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI ATKINSON, NIGEL S · 2008 to 2018
$3.3M
NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA018037NIAAA NIH HHS R01AA018037NIAAA NIH HHS T32 AA007471NIAAA NIH HHS T32AA007471
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPerhaps the most difficult thing to ascertain concerning the behavior of another animal is its motivation. The motivation underlying the preference of Drosophila melanogaster for ethanol (EtOH)-rich food has long been ascribed to its value as a food. A recently introduced idea is that, as in humans, the pharmacological effects of EtOH also motivate the fly to choose EtOH-rich food over nonalcoholic food.

methodsFlies are given a choice between pipets that contain liquid food and liquid food supplemented with EtOH. In some experiments, carbohydrates are added to the non-EtOH-containing food to balance the calories for EtOH.

resultsWe confirm that D. melanogaster indeed prefer food that is supplemented with EtOH. However, if the alternative food choice is isocaloric, D. melanogaster usually do not show any preference for a 10% EtOH solution. Even after EtOH preference has been established, it can be completely reversed if the alternative food is calorically supplemented. This occurs even when the carbohydrate solution used to balance calories is not gustatorily attractive. Furthermore, if the alternative food contains more calories than the EtOH food, the flies will prefer the non-EtOH food. We go on to show that during the preference assay that EtOH in the fly does not exceed 4 mM, which in mammals is a nonintoxicating dose.

conclusionsWe conclude that preference for EtOH in this assay arises not from the pharmacological effects of EtOH but rather because of its nutritive value.

Indexed as

Alcohol DrinkingAnimalsChoice BehaviorDrosophila melanogasterEnergy IntakeEthanolFemaleFood PreferencesEthanol

Identifiers

PMID22551215
PMCPMC3414655
OpenAlexW1989694898

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.