Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22551104›Full record

Trial reportThe New England journal of medicine2012

A randomized trial of urodynamic testing before stress-incontinence surgery.

Charles W Nager, Linda Brubaker, Heather J Litman, Halina M Zyczynski, R Edward Varner, Cindy Amundsen, Larry T Sirls, Peggy A Norton, Amy M Arisco, Toby C Chai and 25 more

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The New England journal of medicine, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 140 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
140citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00803959 phase4completednot on this map

A Randomized Trial of Urodynamic Testing Before Stress-Incontinence Surgery

TypeinterventionalSponsorCarelon ResearchRan2008 to 2010Enrolled630ConditionsUrinary IncontinenceArmsOffice evaluation, UDS
NCT03107130 completednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Complex Urodynamic Testing: Who Requires it? A Retrospective Review

TypeobservationalSponsorTriHealth Inc.Ran2017 to 2018Enrolled266ConditionsUrodynamic Studies
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

140 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational

80 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

35 authors.

Charles W NagerUniversity of California at San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92037-1300, USA. cnager@ucsd.edu
Linda Brubaker
Heather J Litman
Halina M Zyczynski
R Edward Varner
Cindy Amundsen
Larry T Sirls
Peggy A Norton
Amy M Arisco
Toby C Chai
Philippe Zimmern
Matthew D Barber
Kimberly J Dandreo
Shawn A Menefee
Kimberly Kenton
Jerry Lowder
Holly E Richter
Salil Khandwala
Ingrid Nygaard
Stephen R Kraus
Harry W Johnson
Gary E Lemack
Marina Mihova
Michael E Albo
Elizabeth Mueller
Gary Sutkin
Tracey S Wilson
Yvonne Hsu
Thomas A Rozanski
Leslie M Rickey
David Rahn
Sharon Tennstedt
John W Kusek
E Ann Gormley
Urinary Incontinence Treatment Network

Funding

Urinary Incontinence Treatment Network: DCCU01DK058229 · NIDDK · NEW ENGLAND RESEARCH INSTITUTES, INC. · PI TENNSTEDT, SHARON L · 2000 to 2012
$16.1M
UAB Continence Treatment Center U01DK060380 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI RICHTER, HOLLY E · 2001 to 2009
$3.9M
Urinary Incontinence Treatment NetworkU01DK058225 · NIDDK · MAGEE-WOMEN'S RES INST AND FOUNDATION · PI ZYCZYNSKI, HALINA M · 2000 to 2009
$3.8M
UCSD INCONTINENCE TREATMENT CENTERU01DK060401 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI ALBO, MICHAEL · 2001 to 2010
$3.6M
Continuation of the Urinary Incontinence Treatment Network (UITN)U01DK060379 · NIDDK · LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO · PI BRUBAKER, LINDA · 2001 to 2009
$3.6M
UTAH URINARY INCONTINENCE TREATMENT NETWORK (UUITN)U01DK060393 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI NORTON, PEGGY A · 2001 to 2009
$3.4M
Pelvic Floor Disorders NetworkU10HD054214 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI LUKACZ, EMILY S. · 2006 to 2015
$3.3M
Urinary Incontinence Treatment NetworkU01DK058231 · NIDDK · WILLIAM BEAUMONT HOSPITAL RESEARCH INST · PI SIRLS, LARRY T · 2000 to 2009
$3.3M
Duke University Medical Center (DUMC) Pelvic Floor Disorders Network (PFDN) Clinical SiteUG1HD041267 · NICHD · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI NAZEMA Y SIDDIQUI · 2016 to 2026
$2.8M
Urinary Incontinence Treatment Network (UITN)U01DK060397 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI CHAI, TOBY C · 2001 to 2010
$2.7M
Urinary Incontinence Treatment NetworkU01DK060395 · NIDDK · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI ZIMMERN, PHILIPPE E · 2001 to 2009
$2.4M
The Urinary Incontinence Treatment NetworkU01DK058234 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI KRAUS, STEPHEN R · 2000 to 2009
$2.3M
NICHD NIH HHS U10 HD054214NICHD NIH HHS UG1 HD041267NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK058225NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK058229NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK058231NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK058234NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK060379NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK060380NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK060393NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK060395NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK060397NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK060401NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK58225NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK58229NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK58231NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK58234NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK60379NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK60380NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK60393NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK60395NIDDK NIH HHS U01 DK60397NIDDK NIH HHS U01DK60401
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUrodynamic studies are commonly performed in women before surgery for stress urinary incontinence, but there is no good evidence that they improve outcomes.

methodsWe performed a multicenter, randomized, noninferiority trial involving women with uncomplicated, demonstrable stress urinary incontinence to compare outcomes after preoperative office evaluation and urodynamic tests or evaluation only. The primary outcome was treatment success at 12 months, defined as a reduction in the score on the Urogenital Distress Inventory of 70% or more and a response of "much better" or "very much better" on the Patient Global Impression of Improvement. The predetermined noninferiority margin was 11 percentage points.

resultsA total of 630 women were randomly assigned to undergo office evaluation with urodynamic tests or evaluation only (315 per group); the proportion in whom treatment was successful was 76.9% in the urodynamic-testing group versus 77.2% in the evaluation-only group (difference, -0.3 percentage points; 95% confidence interval, -7.5 to 6.9), which was consistent with noninferiority. There were no significant between-group differences in secondary measures of incontinence severity, quality of life, patient satisfaction, rates of positive provocative stress tests, voiding dysfunction, or adverse events. Women who underwent urodynamic tests were significantly less likely to receive a diagnosis of overactive bladder and more likely to receive a diagnosis of voiding-phase dysfunction, but these changes did not lead to significant between-group differences in treatment selection or outcomes.

conclusionsFor women with uncomplicated, demonstrable stress urinary incontinence, preoperative office evaluation alone was not inferior to evaluation with urodynamic testing for outcomes at 1 year. (Funded by the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases and the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00803959.).

Indexed as

UrodynamicsFemaleHumansIntention to Treat AnalysisMiddle AgedOffice VisitsSeverity of Illness IndexTreatment OutcomeUrinary Incontinence, StressUrologic Surgical Procedures

Identifiers

PMID22551104
PMCPMC3386296

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.