ArticleSeminars in plastic surgery2010
Esophagus and hypopharyngeal reconstruction.
Article in Seminars in plastic surgery, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Different types of oesophageal reconstructions in the contemporary era: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Irish journal of medical science · 2025Pooled it
- Postoperative monitoring of the free jejunal flap: use of colour duplex and systematic review of available techniques.Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England · 2018Pooled it
- Bouveret's syndrome complicated by iatrogenic esophageal perforation after endoscopic gallstone retrieval: a case report.Journal of surgical case reports · 2026Article
- Efficacy and Safety of Microsurgical Pharyngolaryngeal and Pharyngoesophageal Reconstruction: A Systematic Review of the Literature.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2023Article
- Postoperative serum C-reactive protein dynamics after pharyngolaryngectomy with jejunal free-flap reconstruction.Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England · 2023Article
- Role of Total Laryngopharyngoesophagectomy with Gastric Pull Up in the Management of Locally Advanced Hypopharyngeal Cancers.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2022Article
- Tubed Anterolateral Thigh Free Flap for Pharyngoesophageal Reconstruction.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2020Article
- TYPE II HYPOPHARYNGEAL DEFECT RECONSTRUCTION - A SINGLE INSTITUTION EXPERIENCE.Acta clinica Croatica · 2018Article
- Free jejunum interposition as salvage surgery after cervical esophagus injury.Journal of thoracic disease · 2016Article
- Reconstructive Trends in Post-Ablation Patients with Esophagus and Hypopharynx Defect.Archives of craniofacial surgery · 2015Review
- Foregut caustic injuries: results of the world society of emergency surgery consensus conference.World journal of emergency surgery : WJES · 2015Article
- Retrograde stapling of a free cervical jejunal interposition graft: a technical innovation and case report.BMC surgery · 2014Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This article reviews the literature on esophageal reconstruction. The most common methods used are gastric pull-up, pectoralis major flap, colon interposition, fasciocutaneous flaps (radial forearm free flap or anterolateral thigh flap), and free jejunum and colon flaps. The stricture rates, fistula rates, morbidity, and mortality of each flap are reviewed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.