ReviewGut2013
Next generation sequencing and a new era of medicine.
Review in Gut, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- From DNA to Big Data: NGS Technologies and Their Applications.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025Review
- Enhancing fever of unknown origin diagnosis: machine learning approaches to predict metagenomic next-generation sequencing positivity.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Article
- Identification and clinicopathological analysis of potential p73-regulated biomarkers in colorectal cancer via integrative bioinformatics.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- 3D Models of Sarcomas: The Next-generation Tool for Personalized Medicine.Phenomics (Cham, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Expression and function of myelin expression factor 2 in hepatocellular carcinoma.BMC gastroenterology · 2023Article
- Identification of GPC3 mutation and upregulation in a multidrug resistant osteosarcoma and its spheroids as therapeutic target.Journal of bone oncology · 2021Article
- Resolving trained immunity with systems biology.European journal of immunology · 2021Review
- Identification of Candidate Biomarkers and Prognostic Analysis in Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases.Frontiers in oncology · 2021Article
- Comparative analysis of Lactobacillus gasseri from Chinese subjects reveals a new species-level taxa.BMC genomics · 2020Article
- Next generation sequencing applications for breast cancer research.Clujul medical (1957) · 2015Review
- A pathway-centric survey of somatic mutations in Chinese patients with colorectal carcinomas.PloS one · 2015Article
- The molecular genetics of colorectal cancer.Frontline gastroenterology · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.