Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22549586›Full record

ReviewProtein & cell2012

Epigenetic control on cell fate choice in neural stem cells.

Xiao-Ling Hu, Yuping Wang, Qin Shen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Protein & cell, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Identification of bioactive metabolites using activity metabolomics.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2019
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The epigenetics of aging and neurodegeneration.Progress in neurobiology · 2015
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Mobilizing endogenous stem cells for retinal repair.Translational research : the journal of laboratory and clinical medicine · 2014
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Xiao-Ling HuCenter for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, School of Medicine, Tsinghua Center for Life Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China.
Yuping Wang
Qin Shen

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Derived from neural stem cells (NSCs) and progenitor cells originated from the neuroectoderm, the nervous system presents an unprecedented degree of cellular diversity, interwoven to ensure correct connections for propagating information and responding to environmental cues. NSCs and progenitor cells must integrate cell-intrinsic programs and environmental cues to achieve production of appropriate types of neurons and glia at appropriate times and places during development. These developmental dynamics are reflected in changes in gene expression, which is regulated by transcription factors and at the epigenetic level. From early commitment of neural lineage to functional plasticity in terminal differentiated neurons, epigenetic regulation is involved in every step of neural development. Here we focus on the recent advance in our understanding of epigenetic regulation on orderly generation of diverse neural cell types in the mammalian nervous system, an important aspect of neural development and regenerative medicine.

Indexed as

EpigenomicsChromatinDNA MethylationHistonesHumansNeural Stem CellsNeurogenesisNeurogliaRNA, UntranslatedChromatinHistonesRNA, Untranslated

Identifiers

PMID22549586
PMCPMC4729703

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.