Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22549288›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2012

A phase I multi-institutional study of systemic sorafenib in conjunction with regional melphalan for in-transit melanoma of the extremity.

G M Beasley, A P Coleman, A Raymond, G Sanders, M A Selim, B L Peterson, M S Brady, M A Davies, C Augustine, D S Tyler

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Contemporary Approaches to In-Transit Melanoma.Journal of oncology practice · 2018
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

G M Beasley *Department of Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC.
A P Coleman *Department of Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC.
A RaymondDepartment of Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC.
G SandersDepartment of Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC.
M A SelimDepartment of Pathology, Duke University, Durham, NC.
B L PetersonCancer Center Biostatistics, Duke University, Durham, NC.
M S BradyDepartment of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York.
M A DaviesDepartment of Melanoma Medical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
C AugustineDepartment of Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC.
D S TylerDepartment of Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC.
Duke University · USDurham VA Medical Center · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

Translational Research in Surgical OncologyT32CA093245 · NCI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI ALLEN, PETER J, HARPOLE, DAVID H. · 2002 to 2020
$5.2M
Duke CTSITL1RR024126 · NCRR · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI CALIFF, ROBERT M · 2006 to 2010
$2.2M
NCI NIH HHS CA093245-10NCI NIH HHS T32 CA093245NCRR NIH HHS TL1 RR024126NCRR NIH HHS TL1RR024126
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIsolated limb infusion with melphalan (ILI-M) corrected for ideal body weight (IBW) is a well-tolerated treatment for patients with in-transit extremity melanoma with an approximate 29 % complete response (CR) rate. Sorafenib, a multi-kinase inhibitor, has been shown to augment tumor response to chemotherapy in preclinical studies.

methodsA multi-institutional, dose-escalation, phase I study was performed to evaluate the safety and antitumor activity of sorafenib in combination with ILI-M. Patients with AJCC stage IIIB/IIIC/IV melanoma were treated with sorafenib starting at 400 mg daily for 7 days before and 7 days after ILI-M corrected for IBW. Toxicity, drug pharmacokinetics, and tumor protein expression changes were measured and correlated with clinical response at 3 months.

resultsA total of 20 patients were enrolled at two institutions. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of sorafenib in combination with ILI-M was 400 mg. Four dose-limiting toxicities occurred, including soft tissue ulcerations and compartment syndrome. There were three CRs (15 %) and four partial responses (20 %). Of patients with the Braf mutation, 83 % (n = 6) progressed compared with only 33 % without (n = 12). Short-term sorafenib treatment did alter protein expression as measured with reverse phase protein array (RPPA) analysis, but did not inhibit protein expression in the MAP kinase pathway. Sorafenib did not alter melphalan pharmacokinetics.

conclusionThis trial defined the MTD of systemically administered sorafenib in combination with ILI-M. Although some responses were seen, the addition of sorafenib to ILI-M did not appear to augment the effects of melphalan but did increase regional toxicity.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsExtremitiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMaximum Tolerated DoseMelanomaMelphalanNeoplasm StagingNiacinamidePhenylurea CompoundsPrognosisProtein Array AnalysisSkin NeoplasmsSorafenibMelphalanNiacinamidePhenylurea CompoundsSorafenib

Identifiers

PMID22549288
PMCPMC4402212
OpenAlexW2120507692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.