Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22549283›Full record

ReviewClinical pharmacology and therapeutics2012

Novel data-mining methodologies for adverse drug event discovery and analysis.

R Harpaz, W DuMouchel, N H Shah, D Madigan, P Ryan, C Friedman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 195 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
195citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

195 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

135 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

R HarpazDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA. rave.harpaz@dbmi.columbia.edu
W DuMouchel
N H Shah
D Madigan
P Ryan
C Friedman

Funding

Informatics for Integrating Biology/ the Bedside (RMI)U54LM008748 · NLM · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI KOHANE, ISAAC S. · 2004 to 2013
$39.0M
STANFORD COMPOSITE(RMI)U54HG004028 · NHGRI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI MUSEN, MARK A · 2005 to 2014
$36.2M
Training in Biomedical Informatics at Columbia UniversityT15LM007079 · NLM · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI NOEMIE ELHADAD, GEORGE M HRIPCSAK · 1992 to 2026
$28.9M
Pharmacovigilence using Natural Language Processing, Statistics, and the EHRR01LM010016 · NLM · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI FRIEDMAN, CAROL · 2009 to 2016
$3.4M
NHGRI NIH HHS U54 HG004028NHGRI NIH HHS U54-HG004028NLM NIH HHS 1R01LM010016NLM NIH HHS 2U54LM008748NLM NIH HHS 3R01LM010016-01S1NLM NIH HHS 3R01LM010016-02S1NLM NIH HHS 5T15-LM007079-19NLM NIH HHS R01 LM010016NLM NIH HHS T15 LM007079NLM NIH HHS U54 LM008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An important goal of the health system is to identify new adverse drug events (ADEs) in the postapproval period. Datamining methods that can transform data into meaningful knowledge to inform patient safety have proven essential for this purpose. New opportunities have emerged to harness data sources that have not been used within the traditional framework. This article provides an overview of recent methodological innovations and data sources used to support ADE discovery and analysis.

Indexed as

Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsPharmacovigilanceArtificial IntelligenceCase-Control StudiesCohort StudiesDatabases, BibliographicDatabases, FactualData MiningHumansMultivariate AnalysisResearch Design

Identifiers

PMID22549283
PMCPMC3675775

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.