Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22549229›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Nephrology2012

New strategies to optimize kidney recovery and preservation in transplantation.

Delphine Bon, Nicolas Chatauret, Sébastien Giraud, Raphael Thuillier, Frédéric Favreau, Thierry Hauet

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Nephrology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 126 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Delphine BonUniversity of Poitiers, Department of Medicine and Pharmacy, Poitiers, France.
Nicolas Chatauret
Sébastien Giraud
Raphael Thuillier
Frédéric Favreau
Thierry Hauet
Inserm · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Poitiers · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Optimizing kidney preservation is a primary issue in transplantation, particularly in relation to new donor sources, such as expanded criteria donors (ECDs) and donation after cardiac death (DCD). Kidneys from these donors are highly sensitive to ischemia-reperfusion injuries--the emblematic lesions encountered during transplantation. Despite years of research, static cold storage, with solutions designed in the 1980s, remains the gold standard in kidney transplantation. This kind of preservation, however, is unable to fully protect an ECD or DCD kidney, highlighting the need for novel strategies to improve kidney preservation or promote kidney recovery. This Review provides an overview of the emerging strategies to prevent ischemia-reperfusion injuries in donor kidneys and describes strategies that are aimed at the donor, organ or recipient to improve graft outcome. These approaches include management of donors, preconditioning of the kidney, improvements in organ preservation solutions, postconditioning and regenerative therapies of the kidney graft following transplantation. In addition, machine perfusion provides an interesting opportunity to evaluate kidney graft quality before transplantation. Overall, a combination of therapeutic approaches seem to provide the best outcome, but preclinical studies using relevant models are needed before these approaches can be incorporated into clinical practice.

Indexed as

AnimalsGraft SurvivalHumansIschemic PreconditioningKidney TransplantationOrgan PreservationReperfusion Injury

Identifiers

PMID22549229
OpenAlexW2016189233

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.