Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22549176›Full record

ArticleJournal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine2012

Public health understandings of policy and power: lessons from INSITE.

Patrick Fafard

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Where public health meets public opinion: Understanding political support for fluoridation in Calgary, 2021.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Introduction--Knowledge translation and urban health equity: advancing the agenda.Journal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine · 2012
    Article
  9. Taking power, politics, and policy problems seriously: the limits of knowledge translation for urban health research.Journal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine · 2012
    Article
  10. Reducing the adverse impact of injection drug use in Canada.The Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale · 2012
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Patrick FafardGraduate School of Public and International Affairs, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada. pfafard@uottawa.ca

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research 101693
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drug addiction is a major public health problem, one that is most acutely felt in major cities around the globe. Harm reduction and safe injection sites are an attempt to address this problem and are at the cutting edge of public health policy and practice. One of the most studied safe injection sites is INSITE located in Vancouver, British Columbia. Using INSITE as a case study, this paper argues that knowledge translation offers a limited framework for understanding the development of public health policy. This paper also argues that the experience of INSITE suggests that science and social justice, the meta-ideas that lie at the core of the public health enterprise, are an inadequate basis for a theory of public health policy making. However, on a more positive note, INSITE also shows the value of concepts drawn from the ways in which political science analyzes the policy process.

Indexed as

Drug and Narcotic ControlHealth PolicyTranslational Research, BiomedicalBritish ColumbiaHarm ReductionHumansPolicy MakingPower, PsychologicalPublic HealthSocial Justice

Identifiers

PMID22549176
PMCPMC3531345

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.