Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22548902›Full record

ArticleBipolar disorders2012

Six-month outcomes of customized adherence enhancement (CAE) therapy in bipolar disorder.

Martha Sajatovic, Jennifer Levin, Curtis Tatsuoka, Weronika Micula-Gondek, Edna Fuentes-Casiano, Christopher S Bialko, Kristin A Cassidy

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bipolar disorders, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Martha SajatovicDepartment of Psychiatry Department of Neurology and Neurological Outcomes Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA. martha.sajatovic@uhhospitals.org
Jennifer Levin
Curtis Tatsuoka
Weronika Micula-Gondek
Edna Fuentes-Casiano
Christopher S Bialko
Kristin A Cassidy
Case Western Reserve University · US

Funding

Customized Treatment Adherence Enhancement in Bipolar DisorderR34MH078967 · NIMH · CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY · PI SAJATOVIC, MARTHA X · 2008 to 2010
$634k
NIMH NIH HHS R34 MH078967NIMH NIH HHS R34MH078967
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere are few psychosocial interventions specifically focused on improved treatment adherence in people with bipolar disorder (BD). Customized adherence enhancement (CAE) is a needs-based, manualized approach intended to improve medication adherence in individuals with BD. This was a six-month prospective trial of a CAE among 43 medication non-adherent individuals with BD who were receiving treatment in a community mental health clinic (CMHC).

methodsCAE was flexibly administered in modules applied as indicated by an initial adherence vulnerabilities screening. Screening identified reasons for non-adherence and modules were then administered using pre-set criteria. CAE effects were evaluated at six-week, three-month, and six-month follow-up. The six-month follow-up was our primary time point of interest. The primary outcome was change from baseline in adherence using the Tablets Routine Questionnaire (TRQ) and pill counts. Secondary outcomes included change from baseline in BD symptoms [Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D), Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS), and Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS)].

resultsSubjects completed 86% of scheduled sessions, with only two individuals (5%) not participating in any sessions. The number of dropouts at six months was 12 (28%). Mean baseline non-adherence by TRQ was 48% [standard error (SE) 4.8%] missed tablets within the previous week and 51% (4.1%) missed tablets within the previous month. At six-month follow-up, mean TRQ non-adherence improved to 25% (6.8%) missed tablets for the previous week (p = 0.002) and 21% (5.5%) for the previous month (p < 0.001). Symptoms improved, with a change in the baseline mean (SE) BPRS of 43.6 (1.8) versus an endpoint of 36.1 (2.3) (p = 0.001), and baseline mean (SE) HAM-D of 17.8 (1.1) versus an endpoint of 15.3 (1.6) (p = 0.044).

conclusionCAE was associated with improvements in adherence, symptoms, and functional status. Controlled trials are needed to confirm these preliminary findings.

Indexed as

AdultAntidepressive AgentsBipolar DisorderCognitive Behavioral TherapyFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient CompliancePsychiatric Status Rating ScalesSurveys and QuestionnairesTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeAntidepressive Agents

Identifiers

PMID22548902
PMCPMC3342843
OpenAlexW1907241721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.