Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22548856›Full record

ArticleClinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry2012

Lysosomal storage disorder 4+1 multiplex assay for newborn screening using tandem mass spectrometry: application to a small-scale population study for five lysosomal storage disorders.

Joseph J Orsini, Monica M Martin, Amanda L Showers, Olaf A Bodamer, X Kate Zhang, Michael H Gelb, Michele Caggana

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Newborn screening in mucopolysaccharidoses.Italian journal of pediatrics · 2018
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Newborn screening for Krabbe's disease.Journal of neuroscience research · 2016
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Enzymatic Screening and Diagnosis of Lysosomal Storage Diseases.North American journal of medicine & science
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Joseph J OrsiniNew York State Department of Health, Wadsworth Center, Albany, NY 12201-0509, United States. jjo01@health.state.ny.us
Monica M Martin
Amanda L Showers
Olaf A Bodamer
X Kate Zhang
Michael H Gelb
Michele Caggana
Wadsworth Center · USDr. John T. Macdonald Foundation · USNew York State Department of Health · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

Multiplex Analysis of Inborn Errors of MetabolismR01DK067859 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI GELB, MICHAEL H · 2003 to 2025
$9.8M
MULTIPLEX ANALYSIS OF INBORN ERRORS OF METABOLISMR01GM060184 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI GELB, MICHAEL H · 1999 to 2001
$314k
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK067859NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM060184
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe sought to modify a previously published tandem mass spectrometry method of screening for 5 lysosomal storage disorders (LSDs) in order to make it better suited for high-throughput newborn screening.

methodsTwo 3-mm dried blood spot (DBS) punches were incubated, each with a different assay solution. The quadruplex solution was used for screening for Gaucher, Pompe, Krabbe and Fabry diseases, while a separate solution was used for Niemann-Pick A/B disease.

resultsThe mean activities of acid-β-glucocerebrosidase (ABG), acid sphingomyelinase (ASM), acid glucosidase (GAA), galactocerebroside-β-galactosidase (GALC) and acid-galactosidase A (GLA) were measured on 5055 unidentified newborns. The mean activities (compared with their disease controls) were, 15.1 (0.35), 22.2 (1.34), 16.8 (0.51), 3.61 (0.23), and 20.7 (1.43) (μmol/L/h), respectively. The number of specimens that fell below our retest level cutoff of <20% daily mean activity (DMA) for each analyte is: ABG (6), ASM (0), GAA (5), GALC (17), and GLA (2).

conclusionsThis method provides a simplified and reliable assay for screening for five LSDs with clear distinction between activities from normal and disease samples. Advantages of this new method include significant decreases in processing time and the number of required assay solutions and overall decreased complexity.

Indexed as

alpha-GlucosidasesDried Blood Spot TestingFabry DiseaseGalactosylceramidaseGaucher DiseaseGlucosylceramidaseGlycogen Storage Disease Type IIHumansInfant, NewbornLeukodystrophy, Globoid CellLysosomal Storage DiseasesNeonatal ScreeningNiemann-Pick DiseasesQuality ControlSphingomyelin PhosphodiesteraseTandem Mass Spectrometryalpha-GlucosidasesGAA protein, humanGalactosylceramidaseGlucosylceramidaseSphingomyelin Phosphodiesterase

Identifiers

PMID22548856
PMCPMC3443687
OpenAlexW1986047046

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.