ArticleBMC systems biology2012
Revisiting the variation of clustering coefficient of biological networks suggests new modular structure.
Article in BMC systems biology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clustering of electronic health records in atrial fibrillation patients and impact on prognosis and patient trajectories: a UK linked-dataset study.European heart journal. Digital health · 2025Article
- Cell-Type Specific miRNA Regulatory Network Responses to ABA Stress Revealed by Time Series Transcriptional Atlases in Arabidopsis.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- Article
- NJGCG: A node-based joint Gaussian copula graphical model for gene networks inference across multiple states.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024Article
- Node features of chromosome structure networks and their connections to genome annotation.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024Article
- Single-Sample Networks Reveal Intra-Cytoband Co-Expression Hotspots in Breast Cancer Subtypes.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Identifying Tumor-Associated Genes from Bilayer Networks of DNA Methylation Sites and RNAs.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Self-Organization and Information Processing: From Basic Enzymatic Activities to Complex Adaptive Cellular Behavior.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Review
- Mining Featured Biomarkers Linked with Epithelial Ovarian CancerBased on Bioinformatics.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
- Handling Noise in Protein Interaction Networks.BioMed research international · 2019Article
- Two-State Co-Expression Network Analysis to Identify Genes Related to Salt Tolerance in Thai rice.Genes · 2018Article
- Elements of the cellular metabolic structure.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2015Article
- Learning Graphical Models With Hubs.Journal of machine learning research : JMLR · 2014Article
- Spatiotemporal positioning of multipotent modules in diverse biological networks.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2014Review
- On functional module detection in metabolic networks.Metabolites · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundA central idea in biology is the hierarchical organization of cellular processes. A commonly used method to identify the hierarchical modular organization of network relies on detecting a global signature known as variation of clustering coefficient (so-called modularity scaling). Although several studies have suggested other possible origins of this signature, it is still widely used nowadays to identify hierarchical modularity, especially in the analysis of biological networks. Therefore, a further and systematical investigation of this signature for different types of biological networks is necessary.
resultsWe analyzed a variety of biological networks and found that the commonly used signature of hierarchical modularity is actually the reflection of spoke-like topology, suggesting a different view of network architecture. We proved that the existence of super-hubs is the origin that the clustering coefficient of a node follows a particular scaling law with degree k in metabolic networks. To study the modularity of biological networks, we systematically investigated the relationship between repulsion of hubs and variation of clustering coefficient. We provided direct evidences for repulsion between hubs being the underlying origin of the variation of clustering coefficient, and found that for biological networks having no anti-correlation between hubs, such as gene co-expression network, the clustering coefficient doesn't show dependence of degree.
conclusionsHere we have shown that the variation of clustering coefficient is neither sufficient nor exclusive for a network to be hierarchical. Our results suggest the existence of spoke-like modules as opposed to "deterministic model" of hierarchical modularity, and suggest the need to reconsider the organizational principle of biological hierarchy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.