Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22547659›Full record

ReviewJournal of experimental botany2012

Brassinosteroid action in flowering plants: a Darwinian perspective.

Ulrich Kutschera, Zhi-Yong Wang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of experimental botany, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Transcriptome Shock in Developing Embryos of aInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Quantitative trait mapping of plant architecture in two BCTAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2021
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Horticulture research · 2019
    Article
  19. Functional Characterization of the Steroid Reductase GenesInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2018
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ulrich KutscheraDepartment of Plant Biology, Carnegie Institution for Science, Stanford, California 94305, USA. kut@uni-kassel.de
Zhi-Yong Wang

Funding

Genetic Biochemical Studies of Signaling in Growth and AcclimationR01GM066258 · NIGMS · CARNEGIE INSTITUTION OF WASHINGTON, D.C. · PI ZHIYONG WANG · 2002 to 2026
$10.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM066258PHS HHS R01 G 11066258
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The year 2012 marks the 150th anniversary of the publication of Charles Darwin's first botanical book, on the fertilization of orchids (1862), wherein he described pollen grains and outlined his evolutionary principles with respect to plant research. Five decades later, the growth-promoting effect of extracts of Orchid pollen on coleoptile elongation was documented. These studies led to the discovery of a new class of phytohormones, the brassinosteroids (BRs) that were isolated from rapeseed (Brassica napus) pollen. These growth-promoting steroids, which regulate height, fertility, and seed-filling in crop plants such as rice (Oryza sativa), also induce stress- and disease resistance in green algae and angiosperms. The origin and current status of BR-research is described here, with reference to BR-action and -signal transduction, and it is shown that modern high-yield rice varieties with erect leaves are deficient in endogenous BRs. Since brassinosteroids induce pathogen resistance in rice plants and hence can suppress rice blast- and bacterial blight-diseases, genetic manipulation of BR-biosynthesis or -perception may be a means to increase crop production. Basic research on BR activity in plants, such as Arabidopsis and rice, has the potential to increase crop yields further as part of a 21th century 'green biotech-revolution' that can be traced back to Darwin's classical breeding experiments. It is concluded that 'Nothing in brassinosteroid research makes sense except in the light of Darwinian evolution' and the value of basic science is highlighted, with reference to the genetic engineering of better food crops that may become resistant to a variety of plant diseases.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionBrassinosteroidsFlowersGene Expression Regulation, PlantMagnoliopsidaOryzaPlant Growth RegulatorsBrassinosteroidsPlant Growth Regulators

Identifiers

PMID22547659
PMCPMC3388831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.