ArticleInteractive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery2012
Successful bovine arch replacement for a type A acute aortic dissection in a pregnant woman with severe haemodynamic compromise.
Article in Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Partial Arch Replacement Using Common Trunk Perfusion in Type A Acute Aortic Dissection.Cureus · 2023Article
- Antepartum acute Stanford type A aortic dissection: a case report and literature review.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2022Review
- Successful repair of acute type A aortic dissection during pregnancy at 16World journal of clinical cases · 2019Article
- Pregnancy and Marfan syndrome.Annals of cardiothoracic surgery · 2017Article
- A case of cardiopulmonary arrest due to spontaneous coronary artery dissection in a pregnant woman.BMJ case reports · 2017Article
- Aortic dissection during pregnancy: a difficult clinical scenario.Clinical cardiology · 2013Review
- Emergent cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass in early pregnancy: report of four cases.Research in cardiovascular medicine · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acute aortic dissection is very uncommon in pregnant women and the acute type A aortic dissection carries a high mortality rate outside specialized centres. There are a few cases reported with successful outcomes for the mother and the foetus from major cardiac centres. We are reporting our first experience of acute aortic dissection during the third trimester of pregnancy in a patient with Marfan features, profound haemodynamic compromise on arrival and a bovine aortic arch. Both the mother and the baby are doing well two years postoperatively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.