Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22547348›Full record

Trial reportJournal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract2012

Impact on quality of life after pancreatoduodenectomy: a prospective study comparing preoperative and postoperative scores.

Carlos Chan, Bernardo Franssen, Ismael Domínguez, Alejandro Ramírez-Del Val, Luis F Uscanga, Manuel Campuzano

Abstract readClinical TrialComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Do Complications After Pancreatoduodenectomy Have an Impact on Long-Term Quality of Life and Functional Outcomes?Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches · 2024
    Article
  6. Quality of life after pancreatic surgery.World journal of gastroenterology · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Burden of cancer pain in developing countries: a narrative literature review.ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR · 2018
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Carlos ChanDepartment of Surgery, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición "Salvador Zubirán", Vasco de Quiroga 15 Col. Sección XVI, Tlalpan, 14000, Mexico, D.F. carchan@prodigy.net.mx
Bernardo Franssen
Ismael Domínguez
Alejandro Ramírez-Del Val
Luis F Uscanga
Manuel Campuzano

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionFew studies compare the direct impact of pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) on the patient's quality of life (QOL). The effect of PD in QOL, comparing the preoperative vs. postoperative status, was analyzed.

methodA prospective single-center study was performed. PD patients in a 2-year period were included. A general QOL instrument was applied preoperative, 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery and compared with national norms.

resultsThirty-seven patients were recruited. Twenty of 37 were female. Ampullary carcinoma 14/37, ductal adenocarcinoma in 9/37, and other malignant neoplasms 14/37 were diagnosed. Mortality was absent; 48.6% had complications, 13.5 % required reoperation. Three (median) and 4 (mode) questionnaires were answered per individual. 85 % answered the last questionnaire. 4/37 had cancer related death before a year. Median follow-up was 29 (3-72) months. QOL diminished a month after surgery, physical function (67 vs 40, p<0.0001) and emotional role (37 vs 17, p<0.032) did so significantly. Three months after surgery QOL improved yet not significantly. Six and 12 months postoperatively, physical role (9 vs 49, p=0.001), physical pain (51 vs 71, p=0.01), social function (52 vs 63, p=0.014), vitality (54 vs 64, p=0.018), and emotional role (41 vs 69, p=0.006) improved significantly. DISCUSSION: PD has a favorable impact in quality of life as demonstrated by the improvement of most parameters assessed in the postoperative period.

Indexed as

PancreaticoduodenectomyQuality of LifeAdenocarcinomaAdolescentAdultAgedBile Duct NeoplasmsDuodenal NeoplasmsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHealth Status IndicatorsHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedPancreatic Neoplasms

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.