ReviewNature reviews. Cardiology2012
Biomarkers in acute heart failure--state of the art.
Review in Nature reviews. Cardiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The Assessment of the Readiness of Molecular Biomarker-Based Mobile Health Technologies for Healthcare Applications.Scientific reports · 2015Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Circulating miR-30d Predicts Survival in Patients with Acute Heart Failure.Cellular physiology and biochemistry : international journal of experimental cellular physiology, biochemistry, and pharmacology · 2017Trial
- Association of albumin-bilirubin score with clinical severity and outcome in patients with decompensated heart failure: a retrospective cohort study.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026Article
- Integrating GDF-15 into Multimarker Assessment of Acute Heart Failure: Diagnostic and Prognostic Implications.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- ECM formation and degradation during fibrosis, repair, and regeneration.npj metabolic health and disease · 2025Review
- Prognostic value of platelet volume indices in heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.American journal of blood research · 2025Review
- Could Endothelin-1 Be a Promising Neurohormonal Biomarker in Acute Heart Failure?Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- The Effects of Repeat-Dose Doxorubicin on Cardiovascular Functional Endpoints and Biomarkers in the Telemetry-Equipped Cynomolgus Monkey.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2021Article
- Circular RNA-Expression Profiling Reveals a Potential Role of Hsa_circ_0097435 in Heart Failure via Sponging Multiple MicroRNAs.Frontiers in genetics · 2020Article
- Biomarkers in heart failure: the past, current and future.Heart failure reviews · 2019Review
- Drugs' development in acute heart failure: what went wrong?Heart failure reviews · 2018Review
- Article
- A microfluidic platform with digital readout and ultra-low detection limit for quantitative point-of-care diagnostics.Lab on a chip · 2015Article
- Persistently elevated osteopontin serum levels predict mortality in critically ill patients.Critical care (London, England) · 2015Article
- ELISA in the multiplex era: potentials and pitfalls.Proteomics. Clinical applications · 2015Review
- Challenges in acute heart failure clinical management: optimizing care despite incomplete evidence and imperfect drugs.Critical pathways in cardiology · 2015Review
- Serelaxin: a novel therapy for acute heart failure with a range of hemodynamic and non-hemodynamic actions.American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions · 2014Review
- Clinical relevance of biomarkers in heart failure and cardiorenal syndrome: the role of natriuretic peptides and troponin.Heart failure reviews · 2014Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The role of biomarkers in the management of patients with acute heart failure (HF) has evolved rapidly in the past several years. Representing a major burden on health systems, acute HF has increased the need for earlier diagnosis, better risk stratification, and cost-effective treatment to reduce rates of hospitalization. Biomarker-guided diagnosis and treatment have become essential, especially in the acute setting to which the majority of the patients with acute HF initially present. Studies clearly demonstrate the complexity of these patients, who commonly have multiple comorbidities necessitating an integrative approach. Several groundbreaking studies conducted in the past decade have demonstrated how biomarkers, individually or in combination, can outperform conventional laboratory tests used in the emergency department as well as in hospitalized patients with acute HF. In this Review, we will provide an update on biomarkers considered state of the art in the diagnosis and management of patients with acute HF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
22547172What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.