Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22546773›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of obesity (2005)2012

The proof is in the pudding: children prefer lower fat but higher sugar than do mothers.

J A Mennella, S Finkbeiner, D R Reed

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of obesity (2005), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 86 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Preferences for Sweet and Fatty Taste in Children and Their Mothers in Association with Weight Status.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

J A MennellaMonell Chemical Senses Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
S Finkbeiner
D R Reed
Monell Chemical Senses Center · US

Funding

Taste of medicines for children: genetic variation and medical adherenceR01DC011287 · NIDCD · MONELL CHEMICAL SENSES CENTER · PI LOWENTHAL, ELIZABETH DAWN, MENNELLA, JULIA ANNE · 2011 to 2022
$4.3M
MODEL FOR SENSITIVE PERIODS IN EARLY FLAVOR LEARNINGR01HD037119 · NICHD · MONELL CHEMICAL SENSES CENTER · PI MENNELLA, JULIA ANNE · 1999 to 2016
$3.9M
MAPPING GENES FOR BODY WEIGHT AND FATNESS IN MICER01DK058797 · NIDDK · MONELL CHEMICAL SENSES CENTER · PI REED, DANIELLE RENEE · 2000 to 2013
$3.4M
Molecular BiologyP30DC011735 · NIDCD · MONELL CHEMICAL SENSES CENTER · PI MOSINGER, BEDRICH · 2011 to 2015
$2.5M
Fine mapping of mouse chr 2 for body composition genesR01DK094759 · NIDDK · MONELL CHEMICAL SENSES CENTER · PI REED, DANIELLE RENEE · 2011 to 2014
$1.2M
GENETICS OF BITTER TASTE PERCEPTION IN HUMANSR01DC004698 · NIDCD · MONELL CHEMICAL SENSES CENTER · PI REED, DANIELLE RENEE · 2000 to 2002
$515k
GENETIC LINKAGE STUDIES OF BITTER TASTE PERCEPTIONR03DC003509 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI REED, DANIELLE RENEE · 1997 to 1999
–
NICHD NIH HHS 3R01HD037119-10S1NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD037119NICHD NIH HHS R01HD37119NIDCD NIH HHS P30 DC011735NIDCD NIH HHS P30DC011735NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC004698NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC011287NIDCD NIH HHS R01DC011287NIDCD NIH HHS R03 DC003509NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK058797NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK094759
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAlthough there are established age-related differences in sweet preferences, it remains unknown whether children differ from mothers in their preference for and perception of fat (creaminess). We examined whether individual differences in sucrose and fat preferences and perception are related to age, genotype and lifestyle. SUBJECTS: Children 5-10 years-old (n=84) and their mothers (n=67) chose the concentration of sucrose and fat most preferred in pudding and sucrose most preferred in water using identical, two-alternative, forced-choice procedures, and ranked pudding samples for intensity of sweetness and creaminess. Subjects were also weighed and measured for height, as well as genotyped for a sweet-receptor gene (TAS1R3).

resultsChildren preferred higher concentrations of sucrose in water (P=0.03) and in pudding (P=0.05) and lower concentrations of fat in pudding (P<0.01) than did mothers. Children and mothers were equally able to rank the intensity of different concentrations of fat (P=0.12) but not sucrose in pudding (P=0.01). Obese and lean children and mothers did not differ in preferences, but obese mothers were less able to correctly rank the concentration of fat in pudding than were lean mothers (P=0.03). Mothers who smoked preferred a higher concentration of sucrose than did those who never smoked (P<0.01). Individual differences in sweet preference were associated with genetic variation within the TAS1R3 gene in mothers but not children (P=0.04).

conclusionIrrespective of genotype, children prefer higher concentrations of sugar but lower concentrations of fat in puddings than do their mothers. Thus, reduced-fat foods may be better accepted by children than adults.

Indexed as

Choice BehaviorDietary FatsDietary SucroseFood PreferencesAdultAge FactorsChildChild BehaviorChild, PreschoolFemaleGenotypeHumansMaleMiddle AgedMothersObesityDietary FatsDietary SucroseReceptors, G-Protein-Coupledtaste receptors, type 1

Identifiers

PMID22546773
PMCPMC3429629
OpenAlexW2044910260

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.