Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22546172›Full record

ReviewCritical care (London, England)2012

Clinical review: the hospital of the future - building intelligent environments to facilitate safe and effective acute care delivery.

Brian W Pickering, John M Litell, Vitaly Herasevich, Ognjen Gajic

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Critical care (London, England), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Novel displays of patient information in critical care settings: a systematic review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2019
    Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. The Future of Critical Care Lies in Quality Improvement and Education.Annals of the American Thoracic Society · 2019
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Acute respiratory distress syndrome .Clinical medicine (London, England) · 2017
    Article
  20. Acute respiratory distress syndrome.Clinical medicine (London, England) · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Brian W PickeringDepartment of Anesthesiology, Division of Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA. pickering.brian@mayo.edu
John M Litell
Vitaly Herasevich
Ognjen Gajic
Mayo Clinic · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The translation of knowledge into rational care is as essential and pressing a task as the development of new diagnostic or therapeutic devices, and is arguably more important. The emerging science of health care delivery has identified the central role of human factor ergonomics in the prevention of medical error, omission, and waste. Novel informatics and systems engineering strategies provide an excellent opportunity to improve the design of acute care delivery. In this article, future hospitals are envisioned as organizations built around smart environments that facilitate consistent delivery of effective, equitable, and error-free care focused on patient-centered rather than provider-centered outcomes.

Indexed as

Critical CareDecision MakingDelivery of Health CareErgonomicsForecastingHospital Design and ConstructionHospitalsHumansMedical ErrorsMedical InformaticsOrganizational CulturePatient-Centered CareProfessional-Family RelationsSafety Management

Identifiers

PMID22546172
PMCPMC3681335
OpenAlexW2051510303

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.