Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22544631›Full record

ReviewMycopathologia2012

Lasiodiplodia theobromae keratitis: a case report and review of literature.

Suman Saha, Jayangshu Sengupta, Debdulal Banerjee, Archana Khetan

Abstract readCase ReportsReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Mycopathologia, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. American journal of ophthalmology case reports · 2023
    Article
  5. Medicinal potentialities and pathogenic profile of Lasiodiplodia genus.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2021
    Review
  6. Palm Foliage as Pathways of PathogenicPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. First report ofAccess microbiology · 2019
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Successful Treatment ofCase reports in ophthalmology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Suman SahaOcular Microbiology Services, Priyamvada Birla Aravind Eye Hospital, 10 Loudon Street, Kolkata 700017, West Bengal, India. sumansaha13@gmail.com
Jayangshu Sengupta
Debdulal Banerjee
Archana Khetan
Aravind Eye Hospital · INVidyasagar University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A case report and review of literature is reported of a rare case of fungal keratitis from eastern India. A 32-year-old woman with a history of vegetative trauma presented with keratitis in left eye. Microbiological examination of corneal scraping showed refractile hyphae with aseptate branching filaments and black pigmented colonies on multiple solid agar medium. Organism was identified from culture using D1/D2 region of LSU (Large Sub Unit: 28S rDNA)-based molecular technique. PCR amplified a band with a sequence that was 100 % homologous with Lasiodiplodia theobromae. The organism was susceptible to amphotericin B and voriconazole and demonstrated resistance to itraconazole and fluconazole. A therapeutic keratoplasty was performed following non-responsiveness to initial topical voriconazole (2 %) therapy. Recurrence in graft was controlled with topical voriconazole and intracameral amphotericin B. However, the graft failed at the end of 3 months. L. theobromae is a rare cause of fungal keratitis. Management of these cases is difficult, often involving surgical procedures.

Indexed as

AdultAntifungal AgentsAscomycotaBase SequenceFemaleHumansKeratitisMaleMolecular Sequence DataMycosesAntifungal Agents

Identifiers

PMID22544631
OpenAlexW2054762829

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.