Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22544262›Full record

ArticleGenetica2011

A widespread occurrence of extra open reading frames in plant Ty3/gypsy retrotransposons.

Veronika Steinbauerová, Pavel Neumann, Petr Novák, Jiří Macas

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Genetica, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Comparative Analysis of Active LTR Retrotransposons in Sunflower (International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Additional ORFs in Plant LTR-Retrotransposons.Frontiers in plant science · 2020
    Review
  11. Giant Transposons in Eukaryotes: Is Bigger Better?Genome biology and evolution · 2019
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Transposable elements and G-quadruplexes.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2015
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Veronika SteinbauerováInstitute of Plant Molecular Biology, Biology Centre ASCR, Branišovská 31, Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic.
Pavel Neumann
Petr Novák
Jiří Macas
Institute of Plant Molecular Biology · CZCzech Academy of Sciences, Biology Centre · CZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Long terminal repeat (LTR) retrotransposons make up substantial parts of most higher plant genomes where they accumulate due to their replicative mode of transposition. Although the transposition is facilitated by proteins encoded within the gag-pol region which is common to all autonomous elements, some LTR retrotransposons were found to potentially carry an additional protein coding capacity represented by extra open reading frames located upstream or downstream of gag-pol. In this study, we performed a comprehensive in silico survey and comparative analysis of these extra open reading frames (ORFs) in the group of Ty3/gypsy LTR retrotransposons as the first step towards our understanding of their origin and function. We found that extra ORFs occur in all three major lineages of plant Ty3/gypsy elements, being the most frequent in the Tat lineage where most (77 %) of identified elements contained extra ORFs. This lineage was also characterized by the highest diversity of extra ORF arrangement (position and orientation) within the elements. On the other hand, all of these ORFs could be classified into only two broad groups based on their mutual similarities or the presence of short conserved motifs in their inferred protein sequences. In the Athila lineage, the extra ORFs were confined to the element 3' regions but they displayed much higher sequence diversity compared to those found in Tat. In the lineage of Chromoviruses the extra ORFs were relatively rare, occurring only in 5' regions of a group of elements present in a single plant family (Poaceae). In all three lineages, most extra ORFs lacked sequence similarities to characterized gene sequences or functional protein domains, except for two Athila-like elements with similarities to LOGL4 gene and part of the Chromoviruses extra ORFs that displayed partial similarity to histone H3 gene. Thus, in these cases the extra ORFs most likely originated by transduction or recombination of cellular gene sequences. In addition, the protein domain which is otherwise associated with DNA transposons have been detected in part of the Tat-like extra ORFs, pointing to their origin from an insertion event of a mobile element.

Indexed as

DNA, PlantOpen Reading FramesRetroelementsTerminal Repeat SequencesAmino Acid SequenceFernsGene OrderGenetic LinkageMolecular Sequence DataPhylogenyPlant VirusesSequence AlignmentDNA, PlantRetroelements

Identifiers

PMID22544262
OpenAlexW2056536812

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.