Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22543745›Full record

ArticleBone marrow transplantation2012

Evaluation of BM cytomorphology after allo-SCT in patients with AML.

M Christopeit, K Miersch, E Klyuchnikov, T Haferlach, M Binder, T Zabelina, F Ayuk, P Schafhausen, A R Zander, C Bokemeyer and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Bone marrow transplantation, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

M ChristopeitDepartment of Internal Medicine, Oncology and Haematology, University Hospital Halle (Saale), Halle (Saale), Germany.
K Miersch
E Klyuchnikov
T Haferlach
M Binder
T Zabelina
F Ayuk
P Schafhausen
A R Zander
C Bokemeyer
N Kröger
U Bacher
University Cancer Center Hamburg · DEMunich Leukemia Laboratory (Germany) · DEUniversity Hospital in Halle · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Estimation of relapse risk in AML after allo-SCT is critical. The negative impact of increased blast count post transplant is widely accepted. Here, we studied cellularity and dysplasia in BM cytomorphology on days 30 and 100 in 112 AML patients who achieved haematological CR after SCT. Overall cellularity on day 30 was normal in 45.3%, reduced in 37.3% and increased in 17.3% of samples (day 100: normal: 54.8%; reduced: 38.7%; and increased: 6.5%). Dysplasia in ≥10% of cells was frequent on day 30 (granulopoiesis: 25.0% of samples; erythropoiesis: 34.6%; and megakaryopoiesis: 47.7%) and also on day 100. Relapses were less frequent in patients with normal BM cellularity on day 30 (7/34; 20.6%) when compared with reduced (9/28; 32.1%) or increased cellularity (10/13; 76.9%; P = 0.001). Estimated 2-year OS was 59.0% for patients with normal overall cellularity, followed by patients with increased (44.0%) and reduced cellularity (31.4%, P = 0.009). In contrast, cellularity at day 100 and dysplasia at days 30 and 100 did not correlate with outcome measures. Thus, in the cohort studied, BM cellularity represents a prognostic parameter for the post-transplant period in AML patients. Dysplasia seems to be an unspecific phenomenon in the cohort analysed.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedBone Marrow CellsCytodiagnosisCytogeneticsFemaleHumansLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRecurrenceRisk FactorsStem Cell TransplantationTransplantation Chimera

Identifiers

PMID22543745
OpenAlexW1992532446

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.