Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22543541›Full record

ReviewThe American journal of the medical sciences2012

Economic considerations of the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis.

John D Reveille, Antonio Ximenes, Michael M Ward

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The American journal of the medical sciences, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Exercise programmes for ankylosing spondylitis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

John D ReveilleDivision of Rheumatology, University of Texas-Houston Health Science Center, 77030, USA. john.d.reveille@uth.tmc.edu
Antonio Ximenes
Michael M Ward
Instituto de Gastroenterologia de Goiânia · BRNational Institutes of Health · USThe University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston · US

Funding

Outcomes in Rheumatic DiseasesZIAAR041153 · NIAMS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ARTHRITIS AND MUSCULOSKELETAL AND SKIN DISEASES · PI WARD, MICHAEL · 2009 to 2020
$12.6M
The Genetic Basis of AS SusceptibilityP01AR052915 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI BROWN, MATTHEW A · 2006 to 2016
$10.9M
Studies of HLA Region Genomics in Systemic Sclerosis and Ankylosing SpondyilitisU01AI090909 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI MAYES, MAUREEN MAUREEN, REVEILLE, JOHN DUFFIN · 2010 to 2014
$2.9M
Outcomes in Rheumatic DiseasesZ01AR041153 · NIAMS · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ARTHRITIS AND MUSCULOSKELETAL AND SKIN DISEASES · PI WARD, MICHAEL · 2005 to 2008
$1.6M
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 AR041153Intramural NIH HHS ZIA AR041153NIAID NIH HHS 1U01AI090909-01NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI090909NIAMS NIH HHS P01 AR052915PHS HHS P01-052915-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is associated with both significant direct and indirect costs, which vary by country, and have generally increased dramatically since the introduction of anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy. The cost-effectiveness of biologic agents is controversial, although cost-effectiveness studies need to consider the potential impact of anti-tumor necrosis factor treatments on work ability. Alternatives to reduce costs associated with biologics have been examined, including on-demand dosing and lower dose alternatives. Other treatment measures, such as total hip arthroplasty and physical therapy, are also effective in reducing pain and improving function in patients with AS, although the optimal type or combination of physical therapy treatment modalities, the optimal frequency and duration of treatment and whether therapy is equally effective in stable disease and uncontrolled AS need to be determined. No studies have examined differences in patient outcomes based on subspecialty care. Establishing an evidence base for these questions would help inform policy decisions to design the most cost-effective measures to treat AS.

Indexed as

Antirheumatic AgentsCost-Benefit AnalysisExercise TherapyHealth Care CostsHumansPhysician's RoleRheumatologySpondylitis, AnkylosingTumor Necrosis Factor-alphaAntirheumatic AgentsTumor Necrosis Factor-alpha

Identifiers

PMID22543541
PMCPMC3613240
OpenAlexW2067720781

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.