Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22543067›Full record

SynthesisAnesthesia and analgesia2012

Can we make postoperative patient handovers safer? A systematic review of the literature.

Noa Segall, Alberto S Bonifacio, Rebecca A Schroeder, Atilio Barbeito, Dawn Rogers, Deirdre K Thornlow, James Emery, Sally Kellum, Melanie C Wright, Jonathan B Mark and 1 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Anesthesia and analgesia, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03597932 (Intraoperative Handover Checklist of Anesthesia Care Improves Postoperative Outcomes Among Patients Undergoing Major Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 64 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
15.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03597932 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Intraoperative Handover Checklist of Anesthesia Care Improves Postoperative Outcomes Among Patients Undergoing Major Surgery: a Multicenter, Before-after Cohort Study

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorFirst Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang UniversityRan2018 to 2019Enrolled3,342ConditionsAnesthesia, Surgery--Complications, Burnout, ProfessionalArmsstandardized handover checklist
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 251 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Guideline
  4. Patient safety, resident well-being and continuity of care with different resident duty schedules in the intensive care unit: a randomized trial.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2015
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Noa SegallDepartment of Anesthesiology, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3094, Durham, NC 27710, USA. noa.segall@duke.edu
Alberto S Bonifacio
Rebecca A Schroeder
Atilio Barbeito
Dawn Rogers
Deirdre K Thornlow
James Emery
Sally Kellum
Melanie C Wright
Jonathan B Mark
Durham VA Patient Safety Center of Inquiry
Duke Medical Center · USDuke University · USDuke University Hospital · USDurham VA Medical Center · US

Funding

Information Management in the Perioperative EnvironmentK02HS015704 · AHRQ · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI WRIGHT, MELANIE C · 2006 to 2010
$479k
AHRQ HHS K02 HS015704
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Postoperative patient handovers are fraught with technical and communication errors and may negatively impact patient safety. We systematically reviewed the literature on handover of care from the operating room to postanesthesia or intensive care units and summarized process and communication recommendations based on these findings. From >500 papers, we identified 31 dealing with postoperative handovers. Twenty-four included recommendations for structuring the handover process or information transfer. Several recommendations were broadly supported, including (1) standardize processes (e.g., through the use of checklists and protocols); (2) complete urgent clinical tasks before the information transfer; (3) allow only patient-specific discussions during verbal handovers; (4) require that all relevant team members be present; and (5) provide training in team skills and communication. Only 4 of the studies developed an intervention and formally assessed its impact on different process measures. All 4 interventions improved metrics of effectiveness, efficiency, and perceived teamwork. Most of the papers were cross-sectional studies that identified barriers to safe, effective postoperative handovers including the incomplete transfer of information and other communication issues, inconsistent or incomplete teams, absent or inefficient execution of clinical tasks, and poor standardization. An association between poor-quality handovers and adverse events was also demonstrated. More innovative research is needed to define optimal patient handovers and to determine the effect of handover quality on patient outcomes.

Indexed as

Continuity of Patient CarePatient SafetyPatient TransferPostoperative CareAnesthesia Recovery PeriodChecklistClinical ProtocolsGuideline AdherenceHumansIntensive Care UnitsInterdisciplinary CommunicationMedical ErrorsOperating RoomsPatient Care TeamPractice Guidelines as TopicPractice Patterns, Physicians'

Identifiers

PMID22543067
PMCPMC6152818
OpenAlexW2107099173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.