Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22542906›Full record

ReviewNeuroscience and biobehavioral reviews2012

Do initial responses to drugs predict future use or abuse?

Harriet de Wit, Tamara J Phillips

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 120 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
120citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

120 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 180 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Inhalation of Alcohol Vapor: Measurement and Implications.Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research · 2017
    Pooled it
  2. Connectome-based encoding of subjective drug responses to acute oral methamphetamine.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2025
    Trial
  3. Effects of methamphetamine on two measures of reward: Euphoria and neural activation to reward cues.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2025
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Neural activation to monetary reward is associated with amphetamine reward sensitivity.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2018
    Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Associations Between Behavioral and Neural Correlates of Inhibitory Control and Amphetamine Reward Sensitivity.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2017
    Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Personality and the acute subjective effects of d-amphetamine in humans.Journal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England) · 2013
    Trial
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

60 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Harriet de WitDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Chicago, 5841 S Maryland Ave, MC3077, Chicago, IL 60637, United States. hdew@uchicago.edu
Tamara J Phillips
Oregon Health & Science University · USUniversity of Chicago · US

Funding

Translational measures of risk for excessive alcohol consumptionP60AA010760 · NIAAA · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI TAMARA J. PHILLIPS · 2006 to 2026
$34.5M
Traditional Service Core [Translational Service Core (TSC)]P50DA018165 · NIDA · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI PHILLIPS, TAMARA J. · 2006 to 2016
$13.0M
THERMAL AND METABOLIC DYSFUNCTION DURING WITHDRAWALP50AA010760 · NIAAA · OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI CRABBE, JOHN C. · 1996 to 2005
$10.7M
Determinants of Drug Preference in Humans--Administrative SupplementR01DA002812 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI DE WIT, HARRIET · 1985 to 2024
$10.6M
The genetic basis of impulsive behavior in humansR01DA032015 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI DE WIT, HARRIET · 2011 to 2015
$2.4M
Mapping and Microarray Gene Expression Analysis in a Model of Excessive DrinkingU01AA016655 · NIAAA · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI PHILLIPS, TAMARA J. · 2006 to 2010
$1.0M
NIAAA NIH HHS AA010760NIAAA NIH HHS AA016655NIAAA NIH HHS P50 AA010760NIAAA NIH HHS P60 AA010760NIAAA NIH HHS U01 AA016655NIDA NIH HHS DA018165NIDA NIH HHS DA02812NIDA NIH HHS DA032015NIDA NIH HHS P50 DA018165NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA002812NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA032015
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Individuals vary in their initial reactions to drugs of abuse in ways that may contribute to the likelihood of subsequent drug use. In humans, most drugs of abuse produce positive subjective states such as euphoria and feelings of well-being, which may facilitate repeated use. In nonhumans, many drugs initially increase locomotor activity and produce discriminative stimulus effects, both of which have been considered to be models of human stimulant and subjective states. Both humans and nonhumans vary in their sensitivity to early acute drug effects in ways that may predict future use or self-administration, and some of these variations appear to be genetic in origin. However, it is not known exactly how the initial responses to drugs in either humans or nonhumans relate to subsequent use or abuse. In humans, positive effects of drugs facilitate continued use of a drug while negative effects discourage use, and in nonhumans, greater genetic risk for drug intake is predicted by reduced sensitivity to drug aversive effects; but whether these initial responses affect escalation of drug use, and the development of dependence is currently unknown. Although early use of a drug is a necessary step in the progression to abuse and dependence, other variables may be of greater importance in the transition from use to abuse. Alternatively, the same variables that predict initial acute drug effects and early use may significantly contribute to continued use, escalation and dependence. Here we review the existing evidence for relations between initial direct drug effects, early use, and continued use. Ultimately, these relations can only be determined from systematic longitudinal studies with comprehensive assessments from early drug responses to progression of problem drug use. In parallel, additional investigation of initial responses in animal models as predictors of drug use will shed light on the underlying mechanisms.

Indexed as

AnimalsDose-Response Relationship, DrugHumansIndividualityRisk FactorsSelf AdministrationSubstance-Related Disorders

Identifiers

PMID22542906
PMCPMC3372699
OpenAlexW2032714267

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.