Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22542760›Full record

ArticleDevelopmental biology2012

A large-scale RNAi screen identifies functional classes of genes shaping synaptic development and maintenance.

Vera Valakh, Sarah A Naylor, Dominic S Berns, Aaron DiAntonio

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Developmental biology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Transcriptional Reorganization ofFrontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2017
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Loss of the spectraplakin short stop activates the DLK injury response pathway in Drosophila.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2013
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Vera ValakhDepartment of Developmental Biology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO 63110, USA. vvalakh@wustl.edu
Sarah A Naylor
Dominic S Berns
Aaron DiAntonio
Washington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

Role of Postsynaptic Activity in Synapse DevelopmentR01NS043171 · NINDS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI DIANTONIO, AARON · 2003 to 2011
$2.7M
NINDS NIH HHS NS043171NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS043171
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuronal circuit development and function require proper synapse formation and maintenance. Genetic screens are one powerful method to identify the mechanisms shaping synaptic development and stability. However, genes with essential roles in non-neural tissues may be missed in traditional loss-of-function screens. In an effort to circumvent this limitation, we used neuron-specific RNAi knock down in Drosophila and assayed the formation, growth, and maintenance of the neuromuscular junction (NMJ). We examined 1970 Drosophila genes, each of which has a conserved ortholog in mammalian genomes. Knock down of 158 genes in post-mitotic neurons led to abnormalities in the neuromuscular system, including misapposition of active zone components opposite postsynaptic glutamate receptors, synaptic terminal overgrowth and undergrowth, abnormal accumulation of synaptic material within the axon, and retraction of synaptic terminals from their postsynaptic targets. Bioinformatics analysis demonstrates that genes with overlapping annotated function are enriched within the hits for each phenotype, suggesting that the shared biological function is important for that aspect of synaptic development. For example, genes for proteasome subunits and mitotic spindle organizers are enriched among the genes whose knock down leads to defects in synaptic apposition and NMJ stability. Such genes play essential roles in all cells, however the use of tissue- and temporally-restricted RNAi indicates that the proteasome and mitotic spindle organizers participate in discrete aspects of synaptic development. In addition to identifying functional classes of genes shaping synaptic development, this screen also identifies candidate genes whose role at the synapse can be validated by traditional loss-of-function analysis. We present one such example, the dynein-interacting protein NudE, and demonstrate that it is required for proper axonal transport and synaptic maintenance. Thus, this screen has identified both functional classes of genes as well as individual candidate genes that are critical for synaptic development and will be a useful resource for subsequent mechanistic analysis of synapse formation and maintenance.

Indexed as

Genes, DevelopmentalRNA InterferenceAnimalsDrosophilaGene Knockdown TechniquesReceptors, GlutamateSynapsesSynaptic TransmissionReceptors, Glutamate

Identifiers

PMID22542760
PMCPMC3358632
OpenAlexW2146115263

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.