Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22542683›Full record

ArticleFASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology2012

Microfibrous substrate geometry as a critical trigger for organization, self-renewal, and differentiation of human embryonic stem cells within synthetic 3-dimensional microenvironments.

Aaron L Carlson, Charles A Florek, Joseph J Kim, Thomas Neubauer, Jennifer C Moore, Rick I Cohen, Joachim Kohn, Martin Grumet, Prabhas V Moghe

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. PET/EVOH nonwoven fabrics supportRegenerative therapy · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Developing defined substrates for stem cell culture and differentiation.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2018
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Substrates for clinical applicability of stem cells.World journal of stem cells · 2015
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Signals from the surface modulate differentiation of human pluripotent stem cells through glycosaminoglycans and integrins.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2014
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Aaron L CarlsonDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA.
Charles A Florek
Joseph J Kim
Thomas Neubauer
Jennifer C Moore
Rick I Cohen
Joachim Kohn
Martin Grumet
Prabhas V Moghe
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey · US

Funding

NIBIB NIH HHS EB000146
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Substrates used to culture human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) are typically 2-dimensional (2-D) in nature, with limited ability to recapitulate in vivo-like 3-dimensional (3-D) microenvironments. We examined critical determinants of hESC self-renewal in poly-d-lysine-pretreated synthetic polymer-based substrates with variable microgeometries, including planar 2-D films, macroporous 3-D sponges, and microfibrous 3-D fiber mats. Completely synthetic 2-D substrates and 3-D macroporous scaffolds failed to retain hESCs or support self-renewal or differentiation. However, synthetic microfibrous geometries made from electrospun polymer fibers were found to promote cell adhesion, viability, proliferation, self-renewal, and directed differentiation of hESCs in the absence of any exogenous matrix proteins. Mechanistic studies of hESC adhesion within microfibrous scaffolds indicated that enhanced cell confinement in such geometries increased cell-cell contacts and altered colony organization. Moreover, the microfibrous scaffolds also induced hESCs to deposit and organize extracellular matrix proteins like laminin such that the distribution of laminin was more closely associated with the cells than the Matrigel treatment, where the laminin remained associated with the coated fibers. The production of and binding to laminin was critical for formation of viable hESC colonies on synthetic fibrous scaffolds. Thus, synthetic substrates with specific 3-D microgeometries can support hESC colony formation, self-renewal, and directed differentiation to multiple lineages while obviating the stringent needs for complex, exogenous matrices. Similar scaffolds could serve as tools for developmental biology studies in 3-D and for stem cell differentiation in situ and transplantation using defined humanized conditions.

Indexed as

Tissue ScaffoldsBiopolymersCell AdhesionCell Culture TechniquesCell DifferentiationCell ProliferationCollagenDrug CombinationsEmbryonic Stem CellsHumansLamininPolylysineProteoglycansStereoisomerismTyrosineBiopolymersCollagenDrug CombinationsLamininmatrigelpoly(desaminotyrosyl-tyrosine-ethyl ester carbonate)PolylysineProteoglycansTyrosine

Identifiers

PMID22542683
PMCPMC3405262
OpenAlexW2156676526

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.