Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22541788›Full record

ArticleDiagnostic microbiology and infectious disease2012

Development of a multiplex polymerase chain reaction assay for diarrheagenic Escherichia coli and Shigella spp. and its evaluation on colonies, culture broths, and stool.

Mami Taniuchi, Carol C Walters, Jean Gratz, Athanasia Maro, Happiness Kumburu, Oralak Serichantalergs, Orntipa Sethabutr, Ladaporn Bodhidatta, Gibson Kibiki, Denise M Toney and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Microbiologic methods utilized in the MAL-ED cohort study.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2014
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Enteroaggregative Escherichia coli quantification in children stool samples using quantitative PCR.APMIS : acta pathologica, microbiologica, et immunologica Scandinavica · 2013
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Mami TaniuchiDivision of Infectious Diseases and International Health, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22908, USA. mt2f@virginia.edu
Carol C Walters
Jean Gratz
Athanasia Maro
Happiness Kumburu
Oralak Serichantalergs
Orntipa Sethabutr
Ladaporn Bodhidatta
Gibson Kibiki
Denise M Toney
Lynette Berkeley
James P Nataro
Eric R Houpt

Funding

Comprehensive Molecular Diagnosis for Food and Waterborne EnteropathogensU01AI075396 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI HOUPT, ERIC R · 2007 to 2011
$3.0M
NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI075396
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Detection of diarrheagenic Escherichia coli (DEC) typically depends on identification of virulence genes from stool cultures, not on stool itself. We developed a multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay that detects key DEC virulence genes (stx1, stx2, eae, bfpA, ipaH, LT, STh, aaiC, aatA). The assay involved a multiplex PCR reaction followed by detection of amplicon(s) using Luminex beads. The assay was evaluated on over 100 colony and broth specimens. We then evaluated the assay using DNA extracted from stool, colony pools, and Gram-negative broths, using stool spiked with known quantities of DEC. Performance of the assay on stool DNA was most quantitative, while stool broth DNA offered the lowest limit of detection. The assay was prospectively evaluated on clinical specimens in Tanzania. Stool DNA yielded higher sensitivity than colony pools compared with broth DNA as the standard. We propose using this assay to screen for DEC directly in stool or stool broths.

Indexed as

Colony Count, MicrobialDiarrheaEnterobacteriaceae InfectionsEscherichia coliFecesHumansLimit of DetectionMolecular TypingMultiplex Polymerase Chain ReactionProspective StudiesShigellaStatistics, Nonparametric

Identifiers

PMID22541788
PMCPMC5592968

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.