Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22541757›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in cell biology2012

Nuclear bodies: multifunctional companions of the genome.

Miroslav Dundr

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in cell biology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 85 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
85citing papers in PubMed
8.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

85 citing papers in PubMed, 166 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Resolving Sub-Nuclear Architecture from Compartments to Functional Domains.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Nuclear architecture and the structural basis of mitotic memory.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2023
    Review
  8. Liquid-liquid phase separation in hair cell stereocilia development and maintenance.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

25 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Miroslav DundrDepartment of Cell Biology, Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine & Science, North Chicago, IL 60064, United States. mirek.dundr@rosalindfranklin.edu
Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science · US

Funding

Mechanisms of Nuclear Body BiogenesisR01GM090156 · NIGMS · ROSALIND FRANKLIN UNIV OF MEDICINE & SCI · PI DUNDR, MIROSLAV · 2011 to 2015
$1.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM090156NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM090156
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It has become increasingly apparent that gene expression is regulated by the functional interplay between spatial genome organization and nuclear architecture. Within the nuclear environment a variety of distinct nuclear bodies exist. They are dynamic, self-organizing structures that do not assemble as pre-formed entities but rather emerge as a direct reflection of specific activities associated with gene expression and genome maintenance. Here I summarize recent findings on functions of some of the most prominent nuclear bodies, including the nucleolus, Cajal body, PML nuclear body, Polycomb group body and the 53BP1 nuclear body. The emerging view is that their organization is orchestrated by similar principles, and they function in fundamental cellular processes involved in homeostasis, differentiation, development and disease.

Indexed as

GenomeCell NucleolusCell NucleusCoiled BodiesHumans

Identifiers

PMID22541757
PMCPMC3372688
OpenAlexW2075112713

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.