Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22541630›Full record

ReviewThe Lancet. Infectious diseases2012

Hepatitis C virus clearance, reinfection, and persistence, with insights from studies of injecting drug users: towards a vaccine.

Jason Grebely, Maria Prins, Margaret Hellard, Andrea L Cox, William O Osburn, Georg Lauer, Kimberly Page, Andrew R Lloyd, Gregory J Dore, International Collaboration of Incident HIV and Hepatitis C in Injecting Cohorts (InC3)

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Lancet. Infectious diseases, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 112 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
112citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
10.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

112 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 231 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

52 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Jason GrebelyThe Kirby Institute for Infection and Immunity in Society, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia. jgrebely@kirby.unsw.edu.au
Maria Prins
Margaret Hellard
Andrea L Cox
William O Osburn
Georg Lauer
Kimberly Page
Andrew R Lloyd
Gregory J Dore
International Collaboration of Incident HIV and Hepatitis C in Injecting Cohorts (InC3)
UNSW Sydney · AUJohns Hopkins University · USGGD Amsterdam · NLMassachusetts General Hospital · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

Virology CoreU19AI082630 · NIAID · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI RAYMOND T CHUNG, GEORG Michael LAUER · 2009 to 2026
$48.1M
UCSF Liver Core CenterP30DK026743 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI Holger Willenbring · 1986 to 2026
$30.7M
Acute Hepatitis C Infection in Young InjectorsR01DA016017 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO HEALTH SCIS CTR · PI PAGE, KIMBERLY · 2002 to 2018
$14.0M
Virus-Host Interactions in Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) InfectionsU19AI040035 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL BR GALVESTON · PI LEMON, STANLEY M. · 1996 to 2009
$12.0M
The role of NK cells during acute HCV infection and antiviral therapyU19AI066345 · NIAID · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI KIM, ARTHUR Y · 2005 to 2014
$8.5M
Scientific CoreU19AI088791 · NIAID · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI SHAW, GEORGE M · 2010 to 2020
$8.2M
International Collaborative of prospective studies of HIV and Hepatitis in IDUR01DA031056 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO HEALTH SCIS CTR · PI PAGE, KIMBERLY · 2011 to 2015
$2.2M
Mechanisms of Immune Evasion by Hepatitis C VirusR01AI077757 · NIAID · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI COX, ANDREA L · 2009 to 2012
$1.7M
Medical Research CouncilNIAID NIH HHS R01 AI077757NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI040035NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI066345NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI082630NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI088791NIDA NIH HHS 1R01DA031056-01A1NIDA NIH HHS 5R01DA016017NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA016017NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA031056NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK026743
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) was discovered more than two decades ago, but progress towards a vaccine has been slow. HCV infection will spontaneously clear in about 25% of people. Studies of spontaneous HCV clearance in chimpanzees and human beings have identified host and viral factors that could be important in the control of HCV infection and the design of HCV vaccines. Although data from studies of chimpanzees suggest that protection against reinfection is possible after spontaneous clearance, HCV is a human disease. Results from studies of reinfection risk after spontaneous clearance in injecting drug users are conflicting, but some people seem to have protection against HCV persistence. To guide future vaccine development, we assess data from studies of HCV reinfection after spontaneous clearance, discuss flaws in the methods of previous human studies, and suggest essential components for future investigations of control of HCV infection.

Indexed as

Viral Hepatitis VaccinesHepacivirusHepatitis CHumansSubstance Abuse, IntravenousViral Hepatitis Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID22541630
PMCPMC3608418
OpenAlexW2108362208

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.