Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22541596›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical semantics2012

Annotation Analysis for Testing Drug Safety Signals using Unstructured Clinical Notes.

Paea Lependu, Srinivasan V Iyer, Cédrick Fairon, Nigam H Shah

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical semantics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 101 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Graph representation and learning for drug administration prediction.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. DDIWAS: High-throughput electronic health record-based screening of drug-drug interactions.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Performing an Informatics Consult: Methods and Challenges.Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR · 2018
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Paea LependuStanford Center for Biomedical Informatics Research, Stanford University, USA. plependu@stanford.edu.
Srinivasan V Iyer
Cédrick Fairon
Nigam H Shah
Stanford University · USUCLouvain · BE

Funding

STANFORD COMPOSITE(RMI)U54HG004028 · NHGRI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI MUSEN, MARK A · 2005 to 2014
$36.2M
NHGRI NIH HHS U54 HG004028
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe electronic surveillance for adverse drug events is largely based upon the analysis of coded data from reporting systems. Yet, the vast majority of electronic health data lies embedded within the free text of clinical notes and is not gathered into centralized repositories. With the increasing access to large volumes of electronic medical data-in particular the clinical notes-it may be possible to computationally encode and to test drug safety signals in an active manner.

resultsWe describe the application of simple annotation tools on clinical text and the mining of the resulting annotations to compute the risk of getting a myocardial infarction for patients with rheumatoid arthritis that take Vioxx. Our analysis clearly reveals elevated risks for myocardial infarction in rheumatoid arthritis patients taking Vioxx (odds ratio 2.06) before 2005.

conclusionsOur results show that it is possible to apply annotation analysis methods for testing hypotheses about drug safety using electronic medical records.

Identifiers

PMID22541596
PMCPMC3337270
OpenAlexW2168528736

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.