Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22541430›Full record

ArticleCell2012

The transcriptional and epigenomic foundations of ground state pluripotency.

Hendrik Marks, Tüzer Kalkan, Roberta Menafra, Sergey Denissov, Kenneth Jones, Helmut Hofemeister, Jennifer Nichols, Andrea Kranz, A Francis Stewart, Austin Smith and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 510 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
510citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

510 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

450 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Hendrik MarksDepartment of Molecular Biology, Faculty of Science, Radboud University, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Tüzer Kalkan
Roberta Menafra
Sergey Denissov
Kenneth Jones
Helmut Hofemeister
Jennifer Nichols
Andrea Kranz
A Francis Stewart
Austin Smith
Hendrik G Stunnenberg

Funding

Medical Research Council G0800784Medical Research Council G1001028Medical Research Council G1100526Medical Research Council MC_PC_12009Wellcome Trust 079249
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mouse embryonic stem (ES) cells grown in serum exhibit greater heterogeneity in morphology and expression of pluripotency factors than ES cells cultured in defined medium with inhibitors of two kinases (Mek and GSK3), a condition known as "2i" postulated to establish a naive ground state. We show that the transcriptome and epigenome profiles of serum- and 2i-grown ES cells are distinct. 2i-treated cells exhibit lower expression of lineage-affiliated genes, reduced prevalence at promoters of the repressive histone modification H3K27me3, and fewer bivalent domains, which are thought to mark genes poised for either up- or downregulation. Nonetheless, serum- and 2i-grown ES cells have similar differentiation potential. Precocious transcription of developmental genes in 2i is restrained by RNA polymerase II promoter-proximal pausing. These findings suggest that transcriptional potentiation and a permissive chromatin context characterize the ground state and that exit from it may not require a metastable intermediate or multilineage priming.

Indexed as

Histone CodeTranscription, GeneticAnimalsCell DifferentiationEmbryonic Stem CellsEpigenesis, GeneticGenes, mycHistonesMethylationMiceRNA Polymerase IITranscriptomeHistonesRNA Polymerase II

Identifiers

PMID22541430
PMCPMC3398752

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.