ArticlePloS one2012
Structure of metaphase chromosomes: a role for effects of macromolecular crowding.
Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- Orientation-independent-DIC imaging reveals that a transient rise in depletion attraction contributes to mitotic chromosome condensation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
- Single-nucleosome imaging unveils that condensins and nucleosome-nucleosome interactions differentially constrain chromatin to organize mitotic chromosomes.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Orientation-Independent-DIC imaging reveals that a transient rise in depletion force contributes to mitotic chromosome condensation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Article
- Perichromatin region: a moveable feast.Histochemistry and cell biology · 2018Review
- Entropic effect of macromolecular crowding enhances binding between nucleosome clutches in heterochromatin, but not in euchromatin.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Enrichment of dynamic chromosomal crosslinks drive phase separation of the nucleolus.Nucleic acids research · 2017Article
- Reconstitution of mitotic chromatids with a minimum set of purified factors.Nature cell biology · 2015Article
- Distribution of DNA-condensing protein complexes in the adenovirus core.Nucleic acids research · 2015Article
- Article
- Crop epigenetics and the molecular hardware of genotype × environment interactions.Frontiers in plant science · 2015Review
- What macromolecular crowding can do to a protein.International journal of molecular sciences · 2014Review
- A computational study of dsDNA pairs and vibrational resonance in separating water.Systems and synthetic biology · 2014Article
- The energy components of stacked chromatin layers explain the morphology, dimensions and mechanical properties of metaphase chromosomes.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2014Article
- The dynamics of signal amplification by macromolecular assemblies for the control of chromosome segregation.Frontiers in physiology · 2014Review
- The physical chemistry of cytoplasm and its influence on cell function: an update.Molecular biology of the cell · 2013Review
- Intranuclear DNA density affects chromosome condensation in metazoans.Molecular biology of the cell · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In metaphase chromosomes, chromatin is compacted to a concentration of several hundred mg/ml by mechanisms which remain elusive. Effects mediated by the ionic environment are considered most frequently because mono- and di-valent cations cause polynucleosome chains to form compact ~30-nm diameter fibres in vitro, but this conformation is not detected in chromosomes in situ. A further unconsidered factor is predicted to influence the compaction of chromosomes, namely the forces which arise from crowding by macromolecules in the surrounding cytoplasm whose measured concentration is 100-200 mg/ml. To mimic these conditions, chromosomes were released from mitotic CHO cells in solutions containing an inert volume-occupying macromolecule (8 kDa polyethylene glycol, 10.5 kDa dextran, or 70 kDa Ficoll) in 100 µM K-Hepes buffer, with contaminating cations at only low micromolar concentrations. Optical and electron microscopy showed that these chromosomes conserved their characteristic structure and compaction, and their volume varied inversely with the concentration of a crowding macromolecule. They showed a canonical nucleosomal structure and contained the characteristic proteins topoisomerase IIα and the condensin subunit SMC2. These observations, together with evidence that the cytoplasm is crowded in vivo, suggest that macromolecular crowding effects should be considered a significant and perhaps major factor in compacting chromosomes. This model may explain why ~30-nm fibres characteristic of cation-mediated compaction are not seen in chromosomes in situ. Considering that crowding by cytoplasmic macromolecules maintains the compaction of bacterial chromosomes and has been proposed to form the liquid crystalline chromosomes of dinoflagellates, a crowded environment may be an essential characteristic of all genomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.