Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22539673›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2012

Improving the TFold test for differential shotgun proteomics.

Paulo C Carvalho, John R Yates, Valmir C Barbosa

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 83 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Cellular and molecular responses ofMicrobiology spectrum · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. An anti-adhesive peptide found in extracellular vesicles fromCell surface (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Mebendazole InhibitsJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Paulo C CarvalhoCarlos Chagas Institute, Fiocruz, Paraná, Brazil. paulo@pcarvalho.com
John R Yates
Valmir C Barbosa
Fundação Carlos Chagas · BRScripps Research Institute · US

Funding

ZDS2P REGULATES SWE1P-DEPENDENT POLARIZED CELL GROWTH IN S CEREVISIAEP41RR011823 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI DAVIS, TRACY · 1996 to 2011
$24.7M
TrainingP41GM103533 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI MACCOSS, MICHAEL · 2012 to 2021
$20.7M
Quantitative Proteome Analysis of Brain DevelopmentR01MH067880 · NIMH · SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, THE · PI YATES III, JOHN R · 2003 to 2017
$7.1M
NCRR NIH HHS P41 RR011823NIGMS NIH HHS P41 GM103533NIGMS NIH HHS P41 GM130533NIMH NIH HHS 5R01 MH067880NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH067880
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledWe present an updated version of the TFold software for pinpointing differentially expressed proteins in shotgun proteomics experiments. Given an FDR bound, the updated approach uses a theoretical FDR estimator to maximize the number of identifications that satisfy both a fold-change cutoff that varies with the t-test P-value as a power law and a stringency criterion that aims to detect lowly abundant proteins. The new version has yielded significant improvements in sensitivity over the previous one. AVAILABILITY: Freely available for academic use at http://pcarvalho.com/patternlab.

Indexed as

SoftwareAlgorithmsCell Line, TumorComputational BiologyData Interpretation, StatisticalHumansProteinsProteomicsSequence Analysis, ProteinUser-Computer InterfaceProteins

Identifiers

PMID22539673
PMCPMC3371870
OpenAlexW2139675365

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.