Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22539617›Full record

ArticleToxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology2012

Pro-oxidant induced DNA damage in human lymphoblastoid cells: homeostatic mechanisms of genotoxic tolerance.

Anna L Seager, Ume-Kulsoom Shah, Jane M Mikhail, Bryant C Nelson, Bryce J Marquis, Shareen H Doak, George E Johnson, Sioned M Griffiths, Paul L Carmichael, Sharon J Scott and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Anna L SeagerDNA Damage Research Group, Institute of Life Science, College of Medicine, Swansea University, SA2 8PP, UK.
Ume-Kulsoom Shah
Jane M Mikhail
Bryant C Nelson
Bryce J Marquis
Shareen H Doak
George E Johnson
Sioned M Griffiths
Paul L Carmichael
Sharon J Scott
Andrew D Scott
Gareth J S Jenkins
Swansea University · GBNational Institute of Standards and Technology · US

Funding

VOLATILE ORGANIC CONTAMINANTS--QUANTIFYING THEIR MOVEMENT IN THE UNSATURATED ZONEP42ES004911 · NIEHS · MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Timothy R. Zacharewski · 1989 to 2026
$64.9M
NIEHS NIH HHS P42ES04911
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oxidative stress contributes to many disease etiologies including ageing, neurodegeneration, and cancer, partly through DNA damage induction (genotoxicity). Understanding the i nteractions of free radicals with DNA is fundamental to discern mutation risks. In genetic toxicology, regulatory authorities consider that most genotoxins exhibit a linear relationship between dose and mutagenic response. Yet, homeostatic mechanisms, including DNA repair, that allow cells to tolerate low levels of genotoxic exposure exist. Acceptance of thresholds for genotoxicity has widespread consequences in terms of understanding cancer risk and regulating human exposure to chemicals/drugs. Three pro-oxidant chemicals, hydrogen peroxide (H(2)O(2)), potassium bromate (KBrO(3)), and menadione, were examined for low dose-response curves in human lymphoblastoid cells. DNA repair and antioxidant capacity were assessed as possible threshold mechanisms. H(2)O(2) and KBrO(3), but not menadione, exhibited thresholded responses, containing a range of nongenotoxic low doses. Levels of the DNA glycosylase 8-oxoguanine glycosylase were unchanged in response to pro- oxidant stress. DNA repair-focused gene expression arrays reported changes in ATM and BRCA1, involved in double-strand break repair, in response to low-dose pro-oxidant exposure; however, these alterations were not substantiated at the protein level. Determination of oxidatively induced DNA damage in H(2)O(2)-treated AHH-1 cells reported accumulation of thymine glycol above the genotoxic threshold. Further, the H(2)O(2) dose-response curve was shifted by modulating the antioxidant glutathione. Hence, observed pro- oxidant thresholds were due to protective capacities of base excision repair enzymes and antioxidants against DNA damage, highlighting the importance of homeostatic mechanisms in "genotoxic tolerance."

Indexed as

DNA DamageHomeostasisBlotting, WesternBromatesCell LineChromosome AberrationsDNA RepairDose-Response Relationship, DrugGas Chromatography-Mass SpectrometryGlutathioneHumansHydrogen PeroxideLymphocytesMaleMutagensPolymerase Chain ReactionBromatesGlutathioneHydrogen PeroxideMutagenspotassium bromateReactive Oxygen SpeciesVitamin K 3

Identifiers

PMID22539617
PMCPMC3493188
OpenAlexW2153566584

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.