ArticleJournal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry2012
Investigation of scrambled ions in tandem mass spectra. Part 1. Statistical characterization.
Article in Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Gas-phase ion isomer analysis reveals the mechanism of peptide sequence scrambling.Analytical chemistry · 2014Article
- Non-direct sequence ions in the tandem mass spectrometry of protonated peptide amides--an energy-resolved study.Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2013Article
- Investigation of scrambled ions in tandem mass spectra, part 2. On the influence of the ions on peptide identification.Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2013Article
- Exploring radical migration pathways in peptides with positional isomers, deuterium labeling, and molecular dynamics simulations.Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Scrambled ions have become the focus of recent investigations of peptide fragmentation. Here, an investigation of more than 390,000 high quality CID mass spectra is presented to explore the extent of scrambled ions in mass spectra and the possible fragmentation rules during scramble reactions. For the former, scrambled ions generally make up more than 10 % of mass spectra in number, although the abundances are less than 0.1 of the base peak. For the latter, relatively preferential re-opening sites were found for aliphatic residues Ala, Ile, Leu, and other residues such as Met, Gln, Ser, Phe, and Thr, whereas disfavored sites were found for basic residues Arg, Lys, and His, and Trp for both scrambled b and a ions. Similar preferential order in re-opening reaction was found in the reaction of losing internal residues when cleavage occurs at C-terminal side of 20 residues. However, when cleavage occurs at N-terminal side, Glu, Phe, and Trp become the most preferential sites. These results provide a deep insight into cleavage rules during scramble reactions for prediction of peptide mass spectra. Also, an additional investigation of whether scrambled ions could help discriminate false identifications from correct identifications was performed. Probing the number fraction of scrambled ions in falsely and correctly interpreted spectra and analyzing the correlation between scrambled ions and SEQUEST scores XCorr and Sp showed scrambled ions could at some extent help improve the discrimination in singly charged identifications, whereas no improvement was found for multiply charged results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
22539146What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.