Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22539146›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry2012

Investigation of scrambled ions in tandem mass spectra. Part 1. Statistical characterization.

Nai-ping Dong, Yi-zeng Liang, Lun-zhao Yi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nai-ping DongCollege of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Central South University, Changsha, 410083, People's Republic of China.
Yi-zeng Liang
Lun-zhao Yi

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Scrambled ions have become the focus of recent investigations of peptide fragmentation. Here, an investigation of more than 390,000 high quality CID mass spectra is presented to explore the extent of scrambled ions in mass spectra and the possible fragmentation rules during scramble reactions. For the former, scrambled ions generally make up more than 10 % of mass spectra in number, although the abundances are less than 0.1 of the base peak. For the latter, relatively preferential re-opening sites were found for aliphatic residues Ala, Ile, Leu, and other residues such as Met, Gln, Ser, Phe, and Thr, whereas disfavored sites were found for basic residues Arg, Lys, and His, and Trp for both scrambled b and a ions. Similar preferential order in re-opening reaction was found in the reaction of losing internal residues when cleavage occurs at C-terminal side of 20 residues. However, when cleavage occurs at N-terminal side, Glu, Phe, and Trp become the most preferential sites. These results provide a deep insight into cleavage rules during scramble reactions for prediction of peptide mass spectra. Also, an additional investigation of whether scrambled ions could help discriminate false identifications from correct identifications was performed. Probing the number fraction of scrambled ions in falsely and correctly interpreted spectra and analyzing the correlation between scrambled ions and SEQUEST scores XCorr and Sp showed scrambled ions could at some extent help improve the discrimination in singly charged identifications, whereas no improvement was found for multiply charged results.

Indexed as

Amino AcidsData Interpretation, StatisticalIonsPeptide FragmentsReproducibility of ResultsSequence Analysis, ProteinTandem Mass SpectrometryAmino AcidsIonsPeptide Fragments

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.