ReviewWiener klinische Wochenschrift2012
[The benefits of using patient-reported outcomes in cancer treatment: an overview].
Review in Wiener klinische Wochenschrift, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Implementation of patient-reported outcomes in personalized lung cancer care: a qualitative study from the perspective of patients and health care providers.Journal of patient-reported outcomes · 2026Article
- The impact of inter-cycle treatment delays on overall survival in patients with advanced-stage ovarian cancer.The oncologist · 2024Article
- Evaluation by electronic patient-reported outcomes of cancer survivors' needs and the efficacy of inpatient cancer rehabilitation in different tumor entities.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021Article
- Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the RhinAsthma Patient Perspective (RAPP) in the Polish population.Postepy dermatologii i alergologii · 2020Article
- Implementation analysis of patient reported outcomes (PROs) in oncological routine care: an observational study protocol.Health and quality of life outcomes · 2020Observational
- Patient reported outcomes - experiences with implementation in a University Health Care setting.Journal of patient-reported outcomes · 2017Article
- Willingness of Patients with Breast Cancer in the Adjuvant and Metastatic Setting to Use Electronic Surveys (ePRO) Depends on Sociodemographic Factors, Health-related Quality of Life, Disease Status and Computer Skills.Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde · 2016Article
- Validation of the Patient Global Impression of Improvement for Penile Prosthesis.Ochsner journal · 2016Article
- Evaluation of electronic patient-reported outcome assessment with cancer patients in the hospital and at home.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2015Article
- [Self-monitoring in inflammatory rheumatic diseases].Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie · 2014Review
- Chronic Condition Measurement Requires Engagement, Not Measurement Alone.The Journal of ambulatory care managementArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The patient's perspective evaluated by patient-reported outcomes (PROs) gains more and more importance, since treatment efficacy is no longer solely linked to clinical outcomes like cure and overall survival. Ailments like pain, fatigue and social isolation can only be assessed by patients' direct expression without any interpretation made by medical staff. PROs facilitate the disclosure of quality of life issues and patients feel a stronger support due to improved communication. PROs offer many further advantages like saving of time, cost and staff, targeted intervention and sensitizing of clinicians. Also, internationally validated questionnaires are available and the development of electronic PROs eases data-collection, calculation and storage. PROs collected within clinical routine are versatile concerning their applicability: They can be used for scientific analyses, quality assurance, and health technology assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
22538839What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.