ArticleJournal of molecular histology2012
Fly neurons in culture: a model for neural development and pathology.
Article in Journal of molecular histology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fluorescence circadian imaging reveals a PDF-dependent transcriptional regulation of the Drosophila molecular clock.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Evaluating the Autonomy of theFrontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2017Article
- Contrasting developmental axon regrowth and neurite sprouting of Drosophila mushroom body neurons reveals shared and unique molecular mechanisms.Developmental neurobiology · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Primary neural cultures from the fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster, enable a high-resolution glance into cellular processes and neuronal interaction. The development of the culture, along with its vitality and functionality, can be continuously monitored, and the abundance of available tools for D. melanogaster research can greatly assist in characterizing different aspects of the culture. The fly primary neural culture preparation thus offers a promising platform for studying a variety of processes relating to nervous system development, activity and pathology. Our data reveal that neural cultures derived from the CNS of third-instar D. melanogaster larvae undergo an organization process that is specific and consistent throughout different cultures, and culminates in the creation of an elaborate neural network. We demonstrate that this process is accompanied by detectable changes in the protein expression profile of the culture, indicating the involvement of multi-protein processes specific to each stage of the network's development. As a further proof of concept, we demonstrate differential expression of a particular protein family, the gap-junction constructing innexin protein family, throughout the network's life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
22538481What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.