Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22536952›Full record

ArticleJournal of proteome research2012

Systematic comparison of fractionation methods for in-depth analysis of plasma proteomes.

Zhijun Cao, Hsin-Yao Tang, Huan Wang, Qin Liu, David W Speicher

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of proteome research, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Application of Proteomics in Sarcoidosis.American journal of respiratory cell and molecular biology · 2020
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Zhijun CaoCenter for Systems and Computational Biology and Molecular and Cellular Oncogenesis Program, The Wistar Institute , Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States.
Hsin-Yao Tang
Huan Wang
Qin Liu
David W Speicher

Funding

Tumor Microenvironment and MetastasisP30CA010815 · NCI · WISTAR INSTITUTE · PI Luis J Montaner · 1985 to 2026
$75.9M
Identification of Ovarian Cancer Plasma BiomarkersR01CA131582 · NCI · WISTAR INSTITUTE · PI SPEICHER, DAVID W. · 2009 to 2018
$4.1M
Discovery and validation of novel serological biomarkers of colon cancerR01CA120393 · NCI · WISTAR INSTITUTE · PI SPEICHER, DAVID W. · 2006 to 2010
$1.9M
NCI NIH HHS CA010815NCI NIH HHS CA120393NCI NIH HHS CA131582NCI NIH HHS P30 CA010815NCI NIH HHS R01 CA120393NCI NIH HHS R01 CA131582
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Discovery and validation of plasma biomarkers are quite challenging because of the high complexity and wide dynamic range of the plasma proteome. Current plasma protein profiling strategies usually use major protein immunodepletion and nanoLC-MS/MS as the first and final analytical steps, respectively, but additional fractionation is needed to detect and quantify low-abundance disease biomarkers. In this study, the performances of 1-D SDS-PAGE, peptide isoelectrofocusing, and peptide high pH reverse-phase chromatography for fractionation of immunodepleted human plasma were systematically compared by evaluating protein coverage, peptide resolution, and capacity to detect known low-abundance proteins. Trade-offs between increasing the number of fractions to improve proteome coverage and resulting decreases in throughput also were assessed. High pH reverse-phase HPLC exhibited the highest peptide resolution and yielded the best depth of analysis with detection of the largest number of known low-abundance proteins for a given level of fractionation. Another advantage of using high pH reverse-phase fractionation rather than 1-D SDS gels is that all fractionation steps except for abundant protein depletion occur at the peptide level, making this strategy more compatible with quantitative biomarker validation methods such as stable isotope dilution multiple reaction monitoring.

Indexed as

BiomarkersBlood Chemical AnalysisBlood ProteinsChemical FractionationChromatography, High Pressure LiquidChromatography, Reverse-PhaseElectrophoresis, Polyacrylamide GelHumansHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationImmunoprecipitationIsoelectric FocusingPeptide FragmentsProteomeTandem Mass SpectrometryBiomarkersBlood ProteinsPeptide FragmentsProteome

Identifiers

PMID22536952
PMCPMC3430803

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.