Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22536870›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2012

Constructing patch-based ligand-binding pocket database for predicting function of proteins.

Lee Sael, Daisuke Kihara

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Structure- and sequence-based function prediction for non-homologous proteins.Journal of structural and functional genomics · 2012
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lee SaelDepartment of Biological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA.
Daisuke Kihara

Funding

Surface Shape Based Screening of Large Protein DatabasesR01GM075004 · NIGMS · PURDUE UNIVERSITY WEST LAFAYETTE · PI KIHARA, DAISUKE · 2005 to 2009
$1.5M
Identification of protein-metabolite interactome.R01GM097528 · NIGMS · PURDUE UNIVERSITY · PI KIHARA, DAISUKE · 2011 to 2014
$1.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM075004NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM097528
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany of solved tertiary structures of unknown functions do not have global sequence and structural similarities to proteins of known function. Often functional clues of unknown proteins can be obtained by predicting small ligand molecules that bind to the proteins.

methodsIn our previous work, we have developed an alignment free local surface-based pocket comparison method, named Patch-Surfer, which predicts ligand molecules that are likely to bind to a protein of interest. Given a query pocket in a protein, Patch-Surfer searches a database of known pockets and finds similar ones to the query. Here, we have extended the database of ligand binding pockets for Patch-Surfer to cover diverse types of binding ligands. RESULTS AND

conclusionWe selected 9393 representative pockets with 2707 different ligand types from the Protein Data Bank. We tested Patch-Surfer on the extended pocket database to predict binding ligand of 75 non-homologous proteins that bind one of seven different ligands. Patch-Surfer achieved the average enrichment factor at 0.1 percent of over 20.0. The results did not depend on the sequence similarity of the query protein to proteins in the database, indicating that Patch-Surfer can identify correct pockets even in the absence of known homologous structures in the database.

Indexed as

Databases, ProteinProtein ConformationAlgorithmsBinding SitesHumansLigandsProteinsLigandsProteins

Identifiers

PMID22536870
PMCPMC3375630

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.