Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22536421›Full record

ArticlePloS one2012

Development and evaluation of a 9K SNP array for peach by internationally coordinated SNP detection and validation in breeding germplasm.

Ignazio Verde, Nahla Bassil, Simone Scalabrin, Barbara Gilmore, Cynthia T Lawley, Ksenija Gasic, Diego Micheletti, Umesh R Rosyara, Federica Cattonaro, Elisa Vendramin and 13 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 115 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
115citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

115 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Development and Validation of SNP Markers for Plant Genomic Studies.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2027
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Mapping the genomic landscape ofHorticulture research · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Marker-Assisted Selection in Breeding for Fruit Trait Improvement: A Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Development and Evaluation of an AxiomPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Genome-wide association analysis ofFrontiers in plant science · 2023
    Article
  19. Article
  20. A high-density integrated map for grapevine based on three mapping populations genotyped by the Vitis18K SNP chip.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2022
    Article

55 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Ignazio VerdeCRA - Fruit Tree Research Center, Rome, Italy. ignazio.verde@entecra.it
Nahla Bassil
Simone Scalabrin
Barbara Gilmore
Cynthia T Lawley
Ksenija Gasic
Diego Micheletti
Umesh R Rosyara
Federica Cattonaro
Elisa Vendramin
Dorrie Main
Valeria Aramini
Andrea L Blas
Todd C Mockler
Douglas W Bryant
Larry Wilhelm
Michela Troggio
Bryon Sosinski
Maria José Aranzana
Pere Arús
Amy Iezzoni
Michele Morgante
Cameron Peace

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although a large number of single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers covering the entire genome are needed to enable molecular breeding efforts such as genome wide association studies, fine mapping, genomic selection and marker-assisted selection in peach [Prunus persica (L.) Batsch] and related Prunus species, only a limited number of genetic markers, including simple sequence repeats (SSRs), have been available to date. To address this need, an international consortium (The International Peach SNP Consortium; IPSC) has pursued a coordinated effort to perform genome-scale SNP discovery in peach using next generation sequencing platforms to develop and characterize a high-throughput Illumina Infinium® SNP genotyping array platform. We performed whole genome re-sequencing of 56 peach breeding accessions using the Illumina and Roche/454 sequencing technologies. Polymorphism detection algorithms identified a total of 1,022,354 SNPs. Validation with the Illumina GoldenGate® assay was performed on a subset of the predicted SNPs, verifying ∼75% of genic (exonic and intronic) SNPs, whereas only about a third of intergenic SNPs were verified. Conservative filtering was applied to arrive at a set of 8,144 SNPs that were included on the IPSC peach SNP array v1, distributed over all eight peach chromosomes with an average spacing of 26.7 kb between SNPs. Use of this platform to screen a total of 709 accessions of peach in two separate evaluation panels identified a total of 6,869 (84.3%) polymorphic SNPs.The almost 7,000 SNPs verified as polymorphic through extensive empirical evaluation represent an excellent source of markers for future studies in genetic relatedness, genetic mapping, and dissecting the genetic architecture of complex agricultural traits. The IPSC peach SNP array v1 is commercially available and we expect that it will be used worldwide for genetic studies in peach and related stone fruit and nut species.

Indexed as

Polymorphism, Single NucleotideBreedingChromosome MappingChromosomes, PlantGene FrequencyGenetic MarkersHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingInternational CooperationOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisPrunusSequence Analysis, DNAGenetic Markers

Identifiers

PMID22536421
PMCPMC3334984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.