ArticlePatient preference and adherence2012
Patient perceptions of multiple sclerosis and its treatment.
Article in Patient preference and adherence, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Factors affecting adherence to disease-modifying therapies in multiple sclerosis: systematic review.Journal of neurology · 2022Pooled it
- Preferences, Adherence, and Satisfaction: Three Years of Treatment Experiences of People with Multiple Sclerosis.Patient preference and adherence · 2024Article
- Medication self-management toolkits for adults with multiple sclerosis: A scoping review.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2023Article
- Vitamin D Supplementation Practices among Multiple Sclerosis Patients and Professionals.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- A Targeted Literature Search and Phenomenological Review of Perspectives of People with Multiple Sclerosis and Healthcare Professionals of the Immunology of Disease-Modifying Therapies.Neurology and therapy · 2022Review
- Barriers to quality of life in patients with multiple sclerosis: a qualitative study.BMC neurology · 2022Article
- Article
- Patient-based benefit-risk assessment of medicines: development, refinement, and validation of a content search strategy to retrieve relevant studies.Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · 2022Article
- Caregiver Involvement in MS: Duty or Disruption?Neurology and therapy · 2022Article
- Adherence to Therapy in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis-Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Review
- Disease Progression in Multiple Sclerosis: A Literature Review Exploring Patient Perspectives.Patient preference and adherence · 2021Review
- Knowledge Is Power, but Is Ignorance Bliss? Optimising Conversations About Disease Progression in Multiple Sclerosis.Neurology and therapy · 2020Article
- BetaEval Global: Prospective, Multinational, Observational Cohort Study of Patients Using BETACONNECTPatient preference and adherence · 2020Article
- Joint Healthcare Professional and Patient Development of Communication Tools to Improve the Standard of MS Care.Advances in therapy · 2019Article
- Patient Power Revolution in Multiple Sclerosis: Navigating the New Frontier.Neurology and therapy · 2018Article
- Treatment satisfaction and quality of life in patients treated with fingolimod.Patient preference and adherence · 2018Article
- Adherence to fingolimod in multiple sclerosis: an investigator-initiated, prospective, observational, single-center cohort study.Patient preference and adherence · 2017Article
- The state of multiple sclerosis: current insight into the patient/health care provider relationship, treatment challenges, and satisfaction.Patient preference and adherence · 2017Article
- Effectiveness of glatiramer acetate compared to other multiple sclerosis therapies.Brain and behavior · 2015Observational
- Adherence to Disease Modifying Drugs among Patients with Multiple Sclerosis in Germany: A Retrospective Cohort Study.PloS one · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn order to improve the treatment outcome in multiple sclerosis, it is important to document the factors that influence adherence to therapy. The purpose of this study was to determine patient perceptions and awareness of multiple sclerosis and its treatment, treatment adherence, and impact on quality of life and daily living.
methodsThis was a cross-sectional observational study performed in France. Each participating neurologist included the first three patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis who consulted after the start of the study. Data on clinical features were collected from a physician questionnaire and on disease and treatment perception and on quality of life from a patient autoquestionnaire.
resultsA total of 175 neurologists entered 202 patients in the study. The mean duration of disease was 8.0 ± 7.0 years, and immunomodulatory treatment had been administered for a mean duration of 3.0 ± 2.0 years. A total of 166 patients (82.2%) were treated with interferon-β preparations and 36 patients (17.8%) with glatiramer acetate. Eighty-five patients (42.1%) reported missing their injections from time to time and 36 patients (17.8%) reported "drug holidays". The most frequently given reason for nonadherence was forgetfulness (38.7% of cases). Eighty-six patients (42.6%) and 70 patients (34.7%) claimed to be well informed about their disease and treatment, respectively. Adherence was significantly higher in well informed patients (P = 0.035). The majority of patients (176 patients, 87.1%) intended continuing their current treatment and 49.5% considered that their current treatment might reduce relapses. The most frequently reported side effect was muscle pain (124 patients, 61.4%).
conclusionPatient understanding of treatment for disease enhances treatment adherence. Greater patient involvement in disease management requires better communication between physicians and their patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.