Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22535980›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2012

The 2010 global proficiency study of human papillomavirus genotyping in vaccinology.

Carina Eklund, Ola Forslund, Keng-Ling Wallin, Tiequn Zhou, Joakim Dillner, WHO Human Papillomavirus Laboratory Network

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. HPV Type Replacement After HPV Vaccination.Current topics in microbiology and immunology · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. A human papillomavirus whole genome plasmid repository: A resource for HPV DNA quality control reagents.Journal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology · 2023
    Article
  12. Improving human papillomavirus (HPV) testing in the cervical cancer elimination era: The 2021 HPV LabNet international proficiency study.Journal of clinical virology : the official publication of the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Will HPV vaccination prevent cervical cancer?Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine · 2020
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Inverted papilloma of the conjunctiva.BMJ open ophthalmology · 2019
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Carina EklundWHO HPV LabNet Global Reference Laboratory, Department of Clinical and Medical Microbiology, Laboratory Medicine Skåne, and Lund University, Malmö, Sweden.
Ola Forslund
Keng-Ling Wallin
Tiequn Zhou
Joakim Dillner
WHO Human Papillomavirus Laboratory Network

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate and internationally comparable human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA genotyping is essential both for evaluation of HPV vaccines and for effective monitoring and implementation of vaccination programs. The World Health Organization (WHO) HPV Laboratory Network (LabNet) regularly issues international proficiency studies. The 2010 HPV genotyping proficiency panel for HPV vaccinology contained 43 coded samples composed of purified plasmids of 16 HPV types (HPV types 6, 11, 16, 18, 31, 33, 35, 39, 45, 51, 52, 56, 58, 59, 66, and 68a and 68b) and 3 coded extraction controls. Proficient typing was defined as detection in both single and multiple infections of 50 international units (IU) of HPV type 16 (HPV-16) and HPV-18 DNA and 500 genome equivalents (GE) for the other 14 HPV types. Ninety-eight laboratories worldwide submitted a total of 132 data sets. Twenty-four different HPV genotyping assay methods were used, with Linear Array being the most commonly used. Other major assays used were a line blot assay (Inno-LiPa), CLART, type-specific real-time PCR, PCR Luminex, and different microarray assays. Altogether, 72 data sets were proficient for detection of more than 1 type, and only 26 data sets proficiently detected all 16 HPV types. The major oncogenic HPV types, 16 and 18, were proficiently detected in 95.0% (114/120) and 87.0% (94/108) of data sets, respectively. Forty-six data sets reported multiple false-positive results and were considered nonproficient. A trend toward increased sensitivity of assays was seen for the 41 laboratories that participated in both 2008 and 2010. In conclusion, continued global proficiency studies will be required for establishing comparable and reliable HPV genotyping services for vaccinology worldwide.

Indexed as

FemaleGenotypeHumansInternational CooperationLaboratory Proficiency TestingMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesPapillomaviridaePapillomavirus InfectionsVirology

Identifiers

PMID22535980
PMCPMC3405610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.