Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22535892›Full record

ReviewPhysiological reviews2012

The germline stem cell niche unit in mammalian testes.

Jon M Oatley, Ralph L Brinster

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Physiological reviews, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 278 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
278citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

278 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Metabolic transitions define spermatogonial stem cell maturation.Human reproduction (Oxford, England) · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Establishment of Sertoli Cell Lines from Giant Pandas (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  4. Beclin1 Regulates Sertoli Cell Function to Maintain Mouse Spermatogenesis.Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.) · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Decellularized testicular bio-scaffolds driveFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026
    Article
  19. Male germ cell technologies in large animals.The Journal of reproduction and development · 2026
    Review
  20. Ex Vivo Spatiotemporal Characterization of Spermatogenesis in Mouse Testicular Organoids.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article

218 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jon M OatleySchool of Molecular Biosciences, Center for Reproductive Biology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164, USA. joatley@vetmed.wsu.edu
Ralph L Brinster

Funding

Control Spermatogonial Stem Cell Fate Decisions by bHLH Transcription RegulatorsR01HD061665 · NICHD · WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY · PI OATLEY, JON M · 2009 to 2019
$3.1M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD061665
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review addresses current understanding of the germline stem cell niche unit in mammalian testes. Spermatogenesis is a classic model of tissue-specific stem cell function relying on self-renewal and differentiation of spermatogonial stem cells (SSCs). These fate decisions are influenced by a niche microenvironment composed of a growth factor milieu that is provided by several testis somatic support cell populations. Investigations over the last two decades have identified key determinants of the SSC niche including cytokines that regulate SSC functions and support cells providing these factors, adhesion molecules that influence SSC homing, and developmental heterogeneity of the niche during postnatal aging. Emerging evidence suggests that Sertoli cells are a key support cell population influencing the formation and function of niches by secreting soluble factors and possibly orchestrating contributions of other support cells. Investigations with mice have shown that niche influence on SSC proliferation differs during early postnatal development and adulthood. Moreover, there is mounting evidence of an age-related decline in niche function, which is likely influenced by systemic factors. Defining the attributes of stem cell niches is key to developing methods to utilize these cells for regenerative medicine. The SSC population and associated niche comprise a valuable model system for study that provides fundamental knowledge about the biology of tissue-specific stem cells and their capacity to sustain homeostasis of regenerating tissue lineages. While the stem cell is essential for maintenance of all self-renewing tissues and has received considerable attention, the role of niche cells is at least as important and may prove to be more receptive to modification in regenerative medicine.

Indexed as

SpermatogenesisStem Cell NicheAgingAnimalsCell ProliferationCytokinesHumansMaleMiceRatsSertoli CellsSpermatozoaStem CellsTestisCytokines

Identifiers

PMID22535892
PMCPMC3970841

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.