ArticleBMJ open2012
Social and geographical factors affecting access to treatment of colorectal cancer: a cancer registry study.
Article in BMJ open, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Municipal deprivation and cardiometabolic outcomes in Mexican adults: findings from ENSANUT 2021-2023.International journal for equity in health · 2026Article
- Transportation-related factors, cancer screening, and stage at diagnosis: A scoping review.PloS one · 2026Article
- The impact of deprivation on colorectal cancer-stage distribution in a setting with high hospital bed density: A Japanese multilevel study.Cancer medicine · 2024Article
- A Snapshot of the International Views of the Treatment of Rectal Cancer Patients, a Multi-regional Survey: International Tendencies in Rectal Cancer.World journal of surgery · 2021Article
- Article
- Article
- A cancer geography paradox? Poorer cancer outcomes with longer travelling times to healthcare facilities despite prompter diagnosis and treatment: a data-linkage study.British journal of cancer · 2017Article
- Impact of geographic accessibility on utilization of the annual health check-ups by income level in Japan: A multilevel analysis.PloS one · 2017Article
- Selection for laparoscopic resection confers a survival benefit in colorectal cancer surgery in England.Surgical endoscopy · 2016Article
- Article
- Socioeconomic inequalities in relative survival of rectal cancer most obvious in stage III.World journal of surgery · 2014Article
- Research in cancer care disparities in countries with universal healthcare: mapping the field and its conceptual contours.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2014Review
- Does the cancer drugs fund lead to faster uptake of cost-effective drugs? A time-trend analysis comparing England and Wales.British journal of cancer · 2014Article
- The association of time between diagnosis and major resection with poorer colorectal cancer survival: a retrospective cohort study.BMC cancer · 2014Article
- Article
- Risk factors for metastatic disease at presentation with osteosarcoma: an analysis of the SEER database.The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveCancer outcomes vary between and within countries with patients from deprived backgrounds known to have inferior survival. The authors set out to explore the effect of deprivation in relation to the accessibility of hospitals offering diagnostic and therapeutic services on stage at presentation and receipt of treatment.
designAnalysis of a Cancer Registry Database. Data included stage and treatment details from the first 6 months. The socioeconomic status of the immediate area of residence and the travel time from home to hospital was derived from the postcode.
settingPopulation-based study of patients resident in a large area in the north of England.
participants39 619 patients with colorectal cancer diagnosed between 1994 and 2002. OUTCOMES MEASURED: Stage of diagnosis and receipt of treatment in relation to deprivation and distance from hospital.
resultsPatients in the most deprived quartile were significantly more likely to be diagnosed at stage 4 for rectal cancer (OR 1.516, p<0.05) but less so for colonic cancer. There was a trend for both sites for patients in the most deprived quartile to be less likely to receive chemotherapy for stage 4 disease. Patients with colonic cancer were very significantly less likely to receive any treatment if they came from any but the most affluent area (ORs 0.639, 0.603 and 0.544 in increasingly deprived quartiles), this may have been exacerbated if the hospital was distant from their residence (OR for forth quartile for both travel and deprivation 0.731, not significant). The effect was less for rectal cancer and no effect of distance was seen.
conclusionsResiding in a deprived area is associated with tendencies to higher stage at diagnosis and especially in the case of colonic cancer to reduced receipt of treatment. These observations are consistent with other findings and indicate that access to diagnosis requires further investigation.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.