Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22535491›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical pharmacy2012

Evaluation of drug-drug interaction screening software combined with pharmacist intervention.

Cristiano S Moura, Nília M Prado, Najara O Belo, Francisco A Acurcio

Open access · goldAbstract readEvaluation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Drug-drug interactions and pharmacists' interventions among psychiatric patients in outpatient clinics of a teaching hospital in Saudi Arabia.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Drug-drug interactions and acute kidney injury: caveat prescriptor.American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation · 2014
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Detection of potential drug-drug interactions for outpatients across hospitals.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Cristiano S MouraFederal University of Bahia, Vitória da Conquista, Brazil. csmoura@ufba.br
Nília M Prado
Najara O Belo
Francisco A Acurcio
Universidade Federal da Bahia · BRUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDrug-drug interactions (DDI) in hospitalized patients are highly prevalent and an important source of adverse drug reactions. DI computerized screening system can prevent the occurrence of some of these events.

objectiveTo evaluate the impact of drug-drug interaction (DDI) screening software combined with active intervention in preventing drug interactions.

settingThe study was conducted at General Hospital of Vitória da Conquista (HGVC), Brazil.

methodA quasi-experimental study was used to evaluate the impact of IM-Pharma, a locally developed drug-drug interaction screening system, coupled with pharmacist intervention on adverse drug events in the hospital setting.

main outcome measureThe proportion of patients co-prescribed two interacting drugs were measured in two phases, prior the implementation of IM-Pharma and during the intervention period. DDI rates per 100 patient days were calculated before and after implementation. Risk ratios were estimated by Poisson regression models.

resultsA total of 6,834 instances of drug-drug interactions were identified; there was an average of 3.3 DDIs per patient in phase one and 2.5 in phase two, a reduction of 24 % (P = 0.03). There was a 71 % reduction in high-severity drug-drug interaction (P < 0.01). The risk for all DDIs decreased 50 % after the implementation of IM-Pharma (P < 0.01), and for those with high-severity, the reduction was 81 % (P < 0.01).

conclusionThe performance of IM-Pharma combined with pharmacist intervention was positive with an expressive reduction in the risk of DDIs.

Indexed as

Drug InteractionsPharmacistsProfessional RoleSoftwareAdultBrazilDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsFemaleHumansMaleMass ScreeningMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID22535491
OpenAlexW1971873386

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.