ArticleGlycoconjugate journal2012
The class I α1,2-mannosidases of Caenorhabditis elegans.
Article in Glycoconjugate journal, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Increasing Complexity of the N-Glycome During Caenorhabditis Development.Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2023Article
- Comparisons of N-glycans across invertebrate phyla.Parasitology · 2019Review
- N-glycomic Complexity in Anatomical Simplicity:Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2019Review
- Correlations Between LC-MS/MS-Detected Glycomics and NMR-Detected Metabolomics inFrontiers in molecular biosciences · 2019Article
- Characterisation of class I and II α-mannosidases from Drosophila melanogaster.Glycoconjugate journal · 2013Article
- Mass spectrometric analysis of neutral and anionic N-glycans from a Dictyostelium discoideum model for human congenital disorder of glycosylation CDG IL.Journal of proteome research · 2013Article
- Exploring the unique N-glycome of the opportunistic human pathogen Acanthamoeba.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
During the biosynthesis of N-glycans in multicellular eukaryotes, glycans with the compositions Man(5)GlcNAc(2-3) are key intermediates. However, to reach this 'decision point', these N-glycans are first processed from Glc(3)Man(9)GlcNAc(2) through to Man(5)GlcNAc(2) by a number of glycosidases, whereby up to four α1-2-linked mannose residues are removed by class I mannosidases (glycohydrolase family 47). Whereas in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae there are maximally three members of this protein family, in higher organisms there are multiple class I mannosidases residing in the endoplasmic reticulum and Golgi apparatus. The genome of the model nematode Caenorhabditis elegans encodes seven members of this protein family, whereby four are predicted to be classical processing mannosidases and three are related proteins with roles in quality control. In this study, cDNAs encoding the four predicted mannosidases were cloned and expressed in Pichia pastoris and the activity of these enzymes, designated MANS-1, MANS-2, MANS-3 and MANS-4, was verified. The first two can, dependent on the incubation time, remove three to four residues from Man(9)GlcNAc(2), whereas the action of the other two results in the appearance of the B isomer of Man(8)GlcNAc(2); together the complementary activities of these enzymes result in processing to Man(5)GlcNAc(2). With these data, another gap is closed in our understanding of the N-glycan biosynthesis pathway of the nematode worm.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.