ArticleMolecular & cellular proteomics : MCP2012
A computational tool to detect and avoid redundancy in selected reaction monitoring.
Article in Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
33 citing papers in PubMed.
- A protein-protein interaction analysis tool for targeted cross-linking mass spectrometry.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- The Use of Bacteriophages in Biotechnology and Recent Insights into Proteomics.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- CIDer: A Statistical Framework for Interpreting Differences in CID and HCD Fragmentation.Journal of proteome research · 2021Article
- Avant-garde: an automated data-driven DIA data curation tool.Nature methods · 2020Article
- Proteomics-Based Methodologies for the Detection and Quantification of Seafood Allergens.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Proteomic Strategies to Evaluate the Impact of Farming Conditions on Food Quality and Safety in Aquaculture Products.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- The Skyline ecosystem: Informatics for quantitative mass spectrometry proteomics.Mass spectrometry reviews · 2020Review
- Expanding the Use of Spectral Libraries in Proteomics.Journal of proteome research · 2018Review
- Application of targeted mass spectrometry in bottom-up proteomics for systems biology research.Journal of proteomics · 2018Review
- Data-independent acquisition-based SWATH-MS for quantitative proteomics: a tutorial.Molecular systems biology · 2018Review
- Quantification of Inflammasome Adaptor Protein ASC in Biological Samples by Multiple-Reaction Monitoring Mass Spectrometry.Inflammation · 2018Article
- An HS-MRM Assay for the Quantification of Host-cell Proteins in Protein Biopharmaceuticals by Liquid Chromatography Ion Mobility QTOF Mass Spectrometry.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2018Article
- Neucode Labels for Multiplexed, Absolute Protein Quantification.Analytical chemistry · 2016Article
- An Integrated Multiomics Approach to Identify Candidate Antigens for Serodiagnosis of Human Onchocerciasis.Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2015Article
- Reproducible quantitative proteotype data matrices for systems biology.Molecular biology of the cell · 2015Article
- Identification of a Set of Conserved Eukaryotic Internal Retention Time Standards for Data-independent Acquisition Mass Spectrometry.Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2015Article
- Mining Missing Membrane Proteins by High-pH Reverse-Phase StageTip Fractionation and Multiple Reaction Monitoring Mass Spectrometry.Journal of proteome research · 2015Article
- Data-independent-acquisition mass spectrometry for identification of targeted-peptide site-specific modifications.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2015Article
- Automated Validation of Results and Removal of Fragment Ion Interferences in Targeted Analysis of Data-independent Acquisition Mass Spectrometry (MS) using SWATHProphet.Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2015Article
- Building high-quality assay libraries for targeted analysis of SWATH MS data.Nature protocols · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Selected reaction monitoring (SRM), also called multiple reaction monitoring, has become an invaluable tool for targeted quantitative proteomic analyses, but its application can be compromised by nonoptimal selection of transitions. In particular, complex backgrounds may cause ambiguities in SRM measurement results because peptides with interfering transitions similar to those of the target peptide may be present in the sample. Here, we developed a computer program, the SRMCollider, that calculates nonredundant theoretical SRM assays, also known as unique ion signatures (UIS), for a given proteomic background. We show theoretically that UIS of three transitions suffice to conclusively identify 90% of all yeast peptides and 85% of all human peptides. Using predicted retention times, the SRMCollider also simulates time-scheduled SRM acquisition, which reduces the number of interferences to consider and leads to fewer transitions necessary to construct an assay. By integrating experimental fragment ion intensities from large scale proteome synthesis efforts (SRMAtlas) with the information content-based UIS, we combine two orthogonal approaches to create high quality SRM assays ready to be deployed. We provide a user friendly, open source implementation of an algorithm to calculate UIS of any order that can be accessed online at http://www.srmcollider.org to find interfering transitions. Finally, our tool can also simulate the specificity of novel data-independent MS acquisition methods in Q1-Q3 space. This allows us to predict parameters for these methods that deliver a specificity comparable with that of SRM. Using SRM interference information in addition to other sources of information can increase the confidence in an SRM measurement. We expect that the consideration of information content will become a standard step in SRM assay design and analysis, facilitated by the SRMCollider.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.