Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22534616›Full record

Trial reportClinical lymphoma, myeloma & leukemia2012

Twice-daily fludarabine and cytarabine combination with or without gentuzumab ozogamicin is effective in patients with relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia, high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome, and blast- phase chronic myeloid leukemia.

Elias Jabbour, Guillermo Garcia-Manero, Jorge Cortes, Farhad Ravandi, William Plunkett, Varsha Gandhi, Stefan Faderl, Susan O'Brien, Gautam Borthakur, Tapan Kadia and 5 more

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical lymphoma, myeloma & leukemia, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Elias JabbourDepartment of Leukemia, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA. ejabbour@mdanderson.org
Guillermo Garcia-Manero
Jorge Cortes
Farhad Ravandi
William Plunkett
Varsha Gandhi
Stefan Faderl
Susan O'Brien
Gautam Borthakur
Tapan Kadia
Jan Burger
Marina Konopleva
Mark Brandt
Xuelin Huang
Hagop Kantarjian
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer SPORE-LeukemiaP50CA100632 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI KONOPLEVA, MARINA Y · 2003 to 2023
$43.7M
NCI NIH HHS CA100632NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672NCI NIH HHS P50 CA100632
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledWe evaluated the efficacy and safety of the combination of twice-daily fludarabine and cytarabine (BIDFA) in patients with refractory/relapsed acute myeloid leukemia (AML), high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), and chronic myeloid leukemia in myeloid blast phase (CML-BP). One hundred seven patients were enrolled. Overall, 27 (26%) patients responded with a complete remission (CR) rate of 21% and CR without platelet recovery (CRp) of 5%. The overall 4-week mortality rate was 9%. In conclusion, BIDFA is active and safe in heavily pretreated patients with myeloid malignancies.

backgroundThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the combination of twice-daily fludarabine and cytarabine (BIDFA) in patients with refractory/relapsed acute myeloid leukemia (AML), high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), and chronic myeloid leukemia in myeloid blast phase (CML-BP). PATIENTS AND

methodsOne hundred seven patients with refractory/relapsed AML, intermediate and high-risk MDS, and CML-BP, with a performance status of 3 or less and normal organ function were treated. Patients received fludarabine 15 mg/m(2) intravenously (IV) every 12 hours on days 1 to 5 and cytarabine 0.5 g/m(2) IV over 2 hours every 12 hours on days 1 to 5. Gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO) was administered at 3 mg/m(2) IV on day 1 in the first 59 patients. Patients with CML-BP were allowed to receive concomitant tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

resultsOverall, 27 (26%) patients responded with a complete remission (CR) rate of 21% and CR without platelet recovery of 5%. The overall 4-week mortality rate was 9%. The CR rates for patients with relapsed AML with first CR duration greater than or equal to 12 months, relapsed AML with first CR duration less than 12 months, and refractory/relapsed AML beyond first salvage were 56%, 26%, and 11%, respectively. With a median follow-up of 7 months, the 6-month event-free survival, overall survival, and complete remission CR duration rates were 18%, 35%, and 70%, respectively.

conclusionBIDFA is active with an overall response rate of 26% in a heavily pretreated population. This combination is safe with a low 4-week mortality rate of 9%.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAminoglycosidesAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBlast CrisisCytarabineDisease-Free SurvivalGemtuzumabHumansLeukemia, Myelogenous, Chronic, BCR-ABL PositiveLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteMiddle AgedMyelodysplastic SyndromesPrognosisAminoglycosidesAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedCytarabinefludarabineGemtuzumabVidarabine

Identifiers

PMID22534616
PMCPMC3859239
OpenAlexW2049146466

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.