Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22533604›Full record

GuidelineInternational journal of immunogenetics2012

Strategies to work with HLA data in human populations for histocompatibility, clinical transplantation, epidemiology and population genetics: HLA-NET methodological recommendations.

A Sanchez-Mazas, B Vidan-Jeras, J M Nunes, G Fischer, A-M Little, U Bekmane, S Buhler, S Buus, F H J Claas, A Dormoy and 24 more

Abstract readPractice Guideline
In one paragraph

Guideline in International journal of immunogenetics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. HLA Alleles and Haplotype Distribution Across Russian Population Groups.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. HLA testing in the molecular diagnostic laboratory.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2019
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

34 authors.

A Sanchez-MazasUniversity of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland. alicia.sanchez-mazas@unige.ch
B Vidan-Jeras
J M Nunes
G Fischer
A-M Little
U Bekmane
S Buhler
S Buus
F H J Claas
A Dormoy
V Dubois
E Eglite
J F Eliaou
F Gonzalez-Galarza
Z Grubic
M Ivanova
B Lie
D Ligeiro
M L Lokki
B Martins da Silva
J Martorell
D Mendonça
D Middleton
D Papioannou Voniatis
C Papasteriades
F Poli
M E Riccio
M Spyropoulou Vlachou
G Sulcebe
S Tonks
M Toungouz Nevessignsky
C Vangenot
A-M van Walraven
J-M Tiercy

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

HLA-NET (a European COST Action) aims at networking researchers working in bone marrow transplantation, epidemiology and population genetics to improve the molecular characterization of the HLA genetic diversity of human populations, with an expected strong impact on both public health and fundamental research. Such improvements involve finding consensual strategies to characterize human populations and samples and report HLA molecular typings and ambiguities; proposing user-friendly access to databases and computer tools and defining minimal requirements related to ethical aspects. The overall outcome is the provision of population genetic characterizations and comparisons in a standard way by all interested laboratories. This article reports the recommendations of four working groups (WG1-4) of the HLA-NET network at the mid-term of its activities. WG1 (Population definitions and sampling strategies for population genetics' analyses) recommends avoiding outdated racial classifications and population names (e.g. 'Caucasian') and using instead geographic and/or cultural (e.g. linguistic) criteria to describe human populations (e.g. 'pan-European'). A standard 'HLA-NET POPULATION DATA QUESTIONNAIRE' has been finalized and is available for the whole HLA community. WG2 (HLA typing standards for population genetics analyses) recommends retaining maximal information when reporting HLA typing results. Rather than using the National Marrow Donor Program coding system, all ambiguities should be provided by listing all allele pairs required to explain each genotype, according to the formats proposed in 'HLA-NET GUIDELINES FOR REPORTING HLA TYPINGS'. The group also suggests taking into account a preliminary list of alleles defined by polymorphisms outside the peptide-binding sites that may affect population genetic statistics because of significant frequencies. WG3 (Bioinformatic strategies for HLA population data storage and analysis) recommends the use of programs capable of dealing with ambiguous data, such as the 'gene[rate]' computer tools to estimate frequencies, test for Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium and selective neutrality on data containing any number and kind of ambiguities. WG4 (Ethical issues) proposes to adopt thorough general principles for any HLA population study to ensure that it conforms to (inter)national legislation or recommendations/guidelines. All HLA-NET guidelines and tools are available through its website http://hla-net.eu.

Indexed as

EpidemiologyGenetics, PopulationTransplantationAllelesComputational BiologyGene FrequencyHistocompatibilityHistocompatibility TestingHLA AntigensHumansStatistics as TopicHLA Antigens

Identifiers

PMID22533604
PMCPMC3533781

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.