Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22532875›Full record

ArticlePloS one2012

Electrical advantages of dendritic spines.

Allan T Gulledge, Nicholas T Carnevale, Greg J Stuart

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Introduction: What Are Dendritic Spines?Advances in neurobiology · 2023
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The Subcortical-Allocortical- NeocorticalFrontiers in synaptic neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Allan T GulledgeDepartment of Physiology and Neurobiology, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire, United States of America. allan.gulledge@dartmouth.edu
Nicholas T Carnevale
Greg J Stuart

Funding

COMPUTER METHODS FOR PHYSIOLOGICAL PROBLEMSR01NS011613 · NINDS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI MICHAEL L HINES, Robert A. McDougal · 1985 to 2026
$10.4M
SenseLab: Integration of Multidisciplinary Sensory DataR01DC009977 · NIDCD · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI HINES, MICHAEL L, MCDOUGAL, ROBERT A. · 2009 to 2018
$6.7M
INTEGRATIVE MECHANISMS OF CORTICAL NEURONSR01DC000086 · NIDCD · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI SHEPHERD, GORDON · 1989 to 2010
$3.6M
Cholinergic signaling in cortical neurons: a unifying hypothesisR01MH083806 · NIMH · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI GULLEDGE, ALLAN T · 2008 to 2011
$1.3M
NIDCD NIH HHS DC00086NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC000086NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC009977NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH083806NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH83806NINDS NIH HHS NS11613NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS011613
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many neurons receive excitatory glutamatergic input almost exclusively onto dendritic spines. In the absence of spines, the amplitudes and kinetics of excitatory postsynaptic potentials (EPSPs) at the site of synaptic input are highly variable and depend on dendritic location. We hypothesized that dendritic spines standardize the local geometry at the site of synaptic input, thereby reducing location-dependent variability of local EPSP properties. We tested this hypothesis using computational models of simplified and morphologically realistic spiny neurons that allow direct comparison of EPSPs generated on spine heads with EPSPs generated on dendritic shafts at the same dendritic locations. In all morphologies tested, spines greatly reduced location-dependent variability of local EPSP amplitude and kinetics, while having minimal impact on EPSPs measured at the soma. Spine-dependent standardization of local EPSP properties persisted across a range of physiologically relevant spine neck resistances, and in models with variable neck resistances. By reducing the variability of local EPSPs, spines standardized synaptic activation of NMDA receptors and voltage-gated calcium channels. Furthermore, spines enhanced activation of NMDA receptors and facilitated the generation of NMDA spikes and axonal action potentials in response to synaptic input. Finally, we show that dynamic regulation of spine neck geometry can preserve local EPSP properties following plasticity-driven changes in synaptic strength, but is inefficient in modifying the amplitude of EPSPs in other cellular compartments. These observations suggest that one function of dendritic spines is to standardize local EPSP properties throughout the dendritic tree, thereby allowing neurons to use similar voltage-sensitive postsynaptic mechanisms at all dendritic locations.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsComputer SimulationDendritic SpinesElectric StimulationExcitatory Postsynaptic PotentialsModels, NeurologicalNeuronsReceptors, N-Methyl-D-AspartateSynapsesSynaptic TransmissionReceptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate

Identifiers

PMID22532875
PMCPMC3332048

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.